Search for: "Hicks v. Hicks"
Results 381 - 400
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 10:24 pm
Ritter, 2002 BCSC 199 22 M.V.R. (4th) 275, Hicks v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Dixon and Foster, 509 U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2849, 125 L.Ed.2d 556 [1993]; See Hicks on behalf of Feiock v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:20 pm
C-Rod v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
LEXIS 19491February 25, 2011, DecidedFebruary 28, 2011, Filed BENJAMIN HICKS, PLAINTIFF vs. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:52 am
Hicks and State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
It is well established that the admissibility of expert testimony is addressed primarily to the sound discretion of the trial court (see People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430, 433), and here we conclude that the court properly determined that the expert did not possess a professional or technical knowledge that was beyond the ken of the average juror (see People v Hicks, 2 NY3d 75).By not requiring the admission of such testimony or the giving of an adverse inference instruction… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
It is well established that the admissibility of expert testimony is addressed primarily to the sound discretion of the trial court (see People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430, 433), and here we conclude that the court properly determined that the expert did not possess a professional or technical knowledge that was beyond the ken of the average juror (see People v Hicks, 2 NY3d 75).By not requiring the admission of such testimony or the giving of an adverse inference instruction… [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
Every oversight action pending in the House that involves a former official—including, for example, the Judiciary Committee’s past subpoenas to Hicks and Annie Donaldson, former deputy counsel, as well as its recent subpoena to former White House official Rick Dearborn—could potentially be reset to a new default. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm
Indeed, at the very minimum, he would be required, under the rule in Wilson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:38 am
” This rhetorical question — cited prominently in Rosales-Mireles’ brief — was originally posed by Justice Neil Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Hicks v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:24 am
Luke Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am
The court noted dicta from R v C & Ors EWCA Crim 2790 finding that IPP should not be imposed if a lesser sentence provided appropriate public protection. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:49 pm
Mary's Honor Center v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:17 am
Kung Fox & Bill Hicks, D2002-0472 (WIPO July 25, 2002) . [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:02 am
(citing In re Cipro Cases I & II, 121 Cal.App.4th 402, 418 (2004).While each of these defects may have been resolved by redefining the class [Hicks v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:25 pm
Hicks, 480 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:15 pm
Hicks, 480 U. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 15 February, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment in R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd, heard 8 June 2016 R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc, heard on 16 June 2016 Secretary of State for the Home Department v FV (Italy), heard on 21 June 2016 Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners plc, heard on 23 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on… [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016. [read post]
