Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann"
Results 381 - 400
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 12:26 pm
Scott (Columbia University - Law School) have posted Hoffman v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:15 am
(The SPC Blog) EU: European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations unveils anti-counterfeit authentication system (IP Watch) US: Time Magazine on data exclusivity debate (Patent Docs) US: BIO’s IPCC Conference: Behind the scenes look at patent cases – Mayo v Prometheus; Bilski v Doll; Laboratory Court of Am. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:15 am
(The SPC Blog) EU: European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations unveils anti-counterfeit authentication system (IP Watch) US: Time Magazine on data exclusivity debate (Patent Docs) US: BIO's IPCC Conference: Behind the scenes look at patent cases - Mayo v Prometheus; Bilski v Doll; Laboratory Court of Am. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:15 am
(The SPC Blog) EU: European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations unveils anti-counterfeit authentication system (IP Watch) US: Time Magazine on data exclusivity debate (Patent Docs) US: BIO's IPCC Conference: Behind the scenes look at patent cases - Mayo v Prometheus; Bilski v Doll; Laboratory Court of Am. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:17 pm
Lord Hoffmann started the mini-trend of dropping down a court, and now Lord Justice Patten has been at it too. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
On the one hand, Lord Hoffmann's warnings in West Tankers prohibiting the English courts from granting anti-suit injunctions would drive business off-shore may now be given renewed vigour, if you can rely on your American anti-suit injunction by enforcing it in France. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:05 am
Hoffmann-La Roche (Patent Docs) Razadyne (Galanthamine) - US: CAFC: You can’t rely on test results that weren’t available when your patent application was filed: Janssen Pharma and Synaptech v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 9:59 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche's pegylated EPO analog, Mircera ® (see Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
Lord Hoffmann doubted its efficacy and practicality, as opposed to the lawfulness. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 12:03 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 2-07-cv-00507 (TXED August 3, 2009). [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:45 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 541 F.3d 1115, 1129 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:30 am
He cites Lord Hoffmann quoting the Technical Board of Appeal of the EPO in Exxon/Fuel Oils (T 409/91) [1994] O.J. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
The South African sage noted how, in Wagamama, things had actually got off to a great start, what with Advocate General Jacobs' subsequent express endorsement in Puma v Sabel of Sir Hugh's finding that that the function of a trade mark is as a badge of origin, not to mention the definitive rejection in that case of Benelux notions of assessment of likelihood of association. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
The final question in the Commission’s Green Paper (which, incidentally, deserves praise for its concise and focussed presentation of the issues), covers other suggestions for reform of the Regulation’s rules not falling under any of the previous headings. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
This reasoning was, of course, nothing new and was summarised by the eminent Lord Hoffmann in Synthon BV v Smith Kline Beecham plc:"…the matter relied upon as prior art must disclose subject-matter which, if performed, would necessarily result in an infringement of the patent. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
On the other hand, it has been suggested that the decision in Callery v Gray approving a figure as a reasonable premium in road traffic cases at the time has set that figure as a base-line and has resulted in the eradication of downward pressure in the market; and that the requirement for a Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil statement does not in practice ensure that premiums are competitive".Later the Report observes: "In Callery v Gray (Nos 1 and 2) [2002] UKHL 28 Lord… [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:24 am
’ Article 6 respected that democratic principle (per Lord Hoffmann in Alconbury, para 69). [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:26 pm
On anticipation, Mr Justice Floyd summarized the principles expounded by Lord Hoffmann in Synthon BV v. [read post]
