Search for: "Holder v. Superior Court"
Results 381 - 400
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
She was the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (and the mother of current Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch). [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
As I've argued elsewhere, the Supreme Court's decision in NYNEX applies in the patent holdup setting when (1) the patent holder has market power prior to the deception and (2) the deceptive conduct results in higher royalties but not exclusion of rival technologies. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 12:46 pm
Anti-assignment clauses Babener: Do courts enforce anti-assignment clauses in structured settlement documents? [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
Samsung case in California), slide-to-unlock (at issue in the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am
Goold argues that such a rule is superior to strict liability because it creates incentives for both the IP holder and the user to avoid infringement [p. 72]. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:03 pm
As the Court in North Dakota v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 4:14 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
The CRTC has the relevant powers of a court of superior jurisdiction and already makes decisions that affect the fundamental freedoms of Canadians. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
BC347671) APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
Court and OSC Review In coming to its conclusion, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice cited the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders (BCE) for the proposition that three conditions must be satisfied by a corporation seeking an arrangement: that statutory procedures have been met; that the application has been put forward in good faith; and that the arrangement is fair and reasonable. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
CV–267074).July 5, 2011.APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:45 pm
Although the Companies Act permits issue of shares with differential voting rights, SEBI decided to prohibit the issue of shares with “superior” voting rights. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Criminal Sanction Impact. 02/20/07 referred to children and families
LAW / CRIM-PROCA5613
Carrozza (MS) -- Imposes mandatory sentence of imprisonment for theft of motor vehicle SUMM : Add S70.17, Pen L; amd SS180.75, 220.10, 220.30 & 720.10, CP L Imposes mandatory sentence of imprisonment of five years for grand larceny of a motor vehicle; provides that such term shall run consecutively with any other term imposed by the court; imposes certain plea bargaining restrictions. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm
Bob will be the sole holder of Class B Common. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
” (Attorney General Eric Holder, April 11, 2012) “This was competition on the merits, with Apple providing a superior reading platform on a beautiful 10 inch iPad screen, with color, multi-media, and fixed display, and access to millions of future iPad purchasers. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Here's a brief history of the underlying patent dispute, with new information gleaned from recent court documents. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
Also important is Russia’s defiance of the provisional orders issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on March 16 in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
