Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 63,722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 12:20 pm
Divided three-judge Third Circuit panel holds that that court's ruling from 1990 in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:51 pm
My thoughts on that led to an article, titled “The Centre Barely Holds: ERISA Preemption After Gobeille v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 8:22 am
The Oregon Supreme Court today decided State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:22 pm
The United States Supreme Court routinely rejects petitions for writs of certiorari, so today's denial in Pruitt v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:09 am
App. today, holding that Congress lacked the power to abrogate state immunity from suits for damages for violations of the FMLA's self-care provisions. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:00 pm
DiLacio v. [read post]
23 May 2006, 2:32 am
A New York State Supreme Court decision in Rivers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
”) State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Under Article I Section 2, such a tax would have to be apportioned among the states to correspond to the number of seats each state would hold in the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:17 am
The post State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:27 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 1:32 am
State Farm than any other Katrina case, and I see that the Fifth Circuit will hold oral argument December 5 on State Farm's appeal of the $2.7 million verdict. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
” Affirming its earlier holding in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:25 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:03 am
Moreover, the United States Supreme Court had held, in Fong Foo v. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 2:48 am
The ruling follows the recent US Supreme Court holding in US v. [read post]
