Search for: "Hoover v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2009, 9:33 am
In a case decided on September 30, 2009, by the Ohio Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
A New York Times editorial suggests that the recent Alabama Supreme Court decision in 1568 Montgomery Highway Inc. v. the City of Hoover, if appealed to the Supreme Court, could be a good case to test whether "public morality" is a legitimate state interest. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:00 am
" The majority opinion in the 4-3 ruling in State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
On Friday, September 25, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Hoover v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 9:09 am
City of Hoover) a state statute that criminalizes, among other things, "knowingly distribut[ing]... [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:44 pm
Abbott Laboratories, 297 F.3d 544 (7th Cir. 2002); United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:00 pm
For example, abortion was not seen as a hot Supreme Court issue when any of the justices who decided Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court’s Decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Reinstatement following termination pursuant to §73 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Hoover v County of Broome, 2009 NY Slip Op 51101(U), Decided on June 2, 2009, Supreme Court, Broome County, Judge Phillip R. [read post]
22 May 2009, 10:11 am
(See Hoover v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:09 pm
It wasn't Henry V at Agincourt. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
That approach was also affirmed by the current Supreme Court in the ITW v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Parker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:58 am
The IPKat wonders whether, if this was brought up at the time the Dyson v Hoover case was being heard back in 2000 and 2001, this might have affected the outcome. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:18 pm
Here is the conclusion, by the way, slightly rewritten to stand alone, as something I shared with the Hoover Task Force last week:Kenneth Anderson, The Assumptions Behind the Assumptions in the War on Terror: Risk Assessment as an Example of Foundational Disagreement in Counterterrorism Policy(Wayne Law Review, 2008)(Slightly modified conclusion from the not-final draft galleys.)V. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:08 am
HOOVER (1858)THE RAPE OF MARINE SERGEANT LAWRENCE GORDON HUTCHINS, IIIThe American Military Legacy of AttainderCopyright © 2008 The JAG HUNTER [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:20 pm
Dist Bd. of Educ v. [read post]
