Search for: "Hopkins v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes & Anor; Richborough Estate Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council, heard 22 and 23 Feb 2017. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The “Twitter Libel” case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins continued to take the media law headlines this week. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes & Anor; Richborough Estate Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council, heard 22 and 23 Feb 2017. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial of Monroe v Hopkins was heard on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, 27 and 28 February and 1 March 2017. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Hopkins, that sex stereotyping is a form of intentional sex discrimination that violates Title VII, the broad employment discrimination law. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Suffolk Coatal District Council v Hopkins Homes & Anor; Richborough Estate Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council, heard 22 and 23 Feb 2017. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 February 2017, Warby J will hear the much anticipated trial in the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Hernández v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 22 to Thursday 23 February, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm by Gene Takagi
The interests asserted by petitioners cannot be accommodated with that compelling governmental interest, see United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
Though there is an interesting decision on the legal test of the consultation – procedural unfairness must be such that “there has been a procedural unfairness which materially prejudiced the applicant” (via Hopkins Developments Limited v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] PTSR 1145 ), rather than simply a technical flaw. [read post]