Search for: "Housing Authority v. City Council"
Results 381 - 400
of 997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and… [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:21 pm
“[Anthony Burfoot] pushed for the paid appointment of his campaign manager Curt Anderson to the Norfolk Redevelopment Housing Authority. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:14 pm
We’ve seen that Guardian firms are not necessarily great at licensing HMOs… (Indeed LIG have an entry on the Mayor of London’s rogue landlord database following a £15,000 civil penalty for an unlicensed HMO by Westminster City Council. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Brian Haw (the second defendant) has been camping lawfully since 2001 on a pavement on the eastern side of PSG - a part of the highway controlled by Westminster City Council. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Brian Haw (the second defendant) has been camping lawfully since 2001 on a pavement on the eastern side of PSG - a part of the highway controlled by Westminster City Council. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
City of San Jose v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm
On an A1 P1 defence: In Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 the House of Lords held that a local authority’s right to possession could be taken as read without any need to plead particular facts; I think that the same applies to mortgage companies. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court had ruled in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:42 pm
After an initial Design Review Board denial of a demolition and replacement application, the City of Laguna Beach’s City Council granted Hany Dimitry a coastal development permit (CDP) to demolish his outmoded and rickety 1930 house, located between the Pacific Coast Highway and the ocean; it didn’t act on his request for permission to construct a new home. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:15 pm
We couldn't finish the case, and will go back to do so, but two points struck me; firstly that a great deal of money is at stake if we uphold the Council's decision, and secondly that one of the cases we shall have to have regard to is Hope & Glory Public House Ltd v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am
Not because the issues in City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:26 am
Moreover, “the provision of housing to low and middle income city residents is a vital political issue,” and the CPAB is designed to influence policy decisions by the Council on such programs. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Human Rights Council. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
North Coast Railroad Authority, S222472. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:43 am
Case law has been updated throughout, including a last minute note on Tomlinson v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8, a Supreme Court decision on whether the housing duty under the Housing Act 1996 was a civil right for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998, which was only handed down in February 2010. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
In August 1988, when the proprietors of the building failed to carry out repairs mandated by the city council under statutory notices, the city council itself instructed works to be carried out (provided for by section 99 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
Schellinger Brothers v. [read post]
