Search for: "Howe v. Bishop"
Results 381 - 400
of 459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2024, 1:00 am
Quick links Stevie Martin, Strasbourg Observers: Dániel Karsai v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 11:55 pm
Mr Williamson appealed, and in Williamson v The Bishop of London & Ors [2022] EAT 118 the EAT held that ET had correctly ruled that the proceedings before it were a nullity; section 42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 imposed a substantive barrier to the initiation of proceedings by the subject of a CPO, not merely a procedural one. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
Valentine who was actually a bishop. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
How much you say? [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
In R. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Bishop of Chi., 440 U.S. 490 (1979). [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:50 am
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
One can, for example, agree that democracy should be the form of governance but still have serious conflicts about how it applies in practice. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Assessment limits seek to limit how much any individual homeowner’s taxes can rise due to increases in assessed value, but can introduce highly unequal tax burdens across similarly-situated properties. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am
England v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm
Section 102, "National Nanotechnology Program Amendments" would require, within 12 months of the bill's enactment into law, of a strategic plan to guide the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) in achieving activities described in an earlier section and to guide the activities described under subsection (b) that specifies near-term and long-term objectives for the Program, the anticipated time frame for achieving the near-term objectives, and the metrics to be used for… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:07 pm
See, e.g., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:27 am
A local bishop requested the records, got them, and turned them over to Larkins. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
” (Storing, v. 5, pg. 105) Governments, no matter how they claim to derive their legitimate powers, have a tendency to expand beyond their proper bounds at the expense of the people’s individual rights. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
If this Kat were not busying himself tomorrow (Tuesday, that is) in chairing the IP Finance seminar on FRAND licensing, he would be beetling over to the very comfy London office of Allen & Overy, in Bishops Square, to enjoy a rapid response seminar on the UK Supreme Court's extremely recent ruling in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
Nearly three years ago, Justice Alito found himself in the center of a controversy when President Obama in his speech criticized the Court’s (then) recently issued decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:45 pm
Only eighteen months ago, the Supreme Court in Burwell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm
The bishops have told the Pope.. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From yesterday's decision by the Nebraska Court of Appeals in Ewing v. [read post]
