Search for: "Howe v. People" Results 381 - 400 of 35,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2021, 2:27 pm
  So we'll shortly know the definitive answer.Notwithstanding that fact, Justice Elia writes a 26-page opinion saying how he thinks the issue should be decided.I get it. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 1:25 pm
Information about how to manufacture methamphetamine is already available over the internet. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:19 am
Appellate tribunals often resolve complex issues of constitutional and statutory interpretation.But sometimes, even at the highest levels, the cases are relatively straightforward.Take, for example, how the California Supreme Court begins the month of June. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
Justice Liu dissents, and believes that the defendant was insufficiently informed about the nature of the right that he was giving up -- the right to a jury trial.The underlying dispute basically involves how much the judge has to say in order to make sure that the waiver of the right to a jury is "knowing and intelligent" and hence valid. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:38 am by SHG
  No dice, said the Fourth Circuit in Ostregren v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 10:44 am
A recent Third Department case, People v Soriano, 2007 NY Slip Op 00445, is yet another example of how important it is on appeal to carefully scrutinize a trial court's jury charge on the issue of... [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
How far the public policy factors play in the Supreme Court’s decision remains to be seen. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm by Christine Corcos
In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:01 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Recently I wrote about how the Supreme Court decisions in Melendez-Diaz(129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]) and Briscoe v Virginia (559 US ___ [1/25/10]) appeared to undermine and contracidt hte holdings of the New York Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]). [read post]