Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 381 - 400
of 531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
It should not be assumed that the paper decision is correct (for how can it be if fairness demands an oral hearing?) [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
The case had attracted significant interest domestically and internationally, with the claimant supported by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and the Secretary of State for Transport intervening on his behalf. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
” This one-factor test—essentially relying on how the state labels the entity—seems certainly incorrect in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in Goldfarb v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
” Touby v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:25 am
“Judges and other lawyers must learn how to deal with scientific evidence and inference. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
How much more litigation? [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
I § 7), the President decides when and how it is spent, and recently, whether it will be spent at all. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:59 am
See Donovan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:53 pm
The question becomes: how will they react? [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
How To Use this Book You can navigate this book in two ways. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm
NSA Was Created by a Defense Department DirectiveSecond, the NSA was formally created by directive of the Secretary of Defense, acting under specific instructions from the President in 1952. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:07 am
HOW “ROBUST” IS APPELLATE REVIEW OF COURTS-MARTIAL? [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The complainer was advised that the reporter was free to depart from the recommendations of the previous reporter, but the solicitor was not told of this. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Madison (where Secretary of State James Madison chose not to appear in the Supreme Court), Minor v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:58 am
In 2010, the Secretary made a “technical correction” without further notice and comment in a final rule. [read post]
