Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 19,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2014, 7:43 am
It has been announced [pdf] that the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has agreed to hear the “internet comment” case of Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Less than a month apart, two long-awaited judgments in cases involving gay parenting were handed down by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights.Atala v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
“ Read more: Joint Committee on Human Rights calls for control order scheme to be discontinued Human Rights Act helps fight terrorism says head of Supreme Court Case comment on Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) v (1) AF (2) AM (3) AN [2009] UKHL 28 [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:20 am
In Moore v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:45 pm
Supreme Court argument on behalf of immigrant mothers underscored the human impact of immigration policy, presented as the keynote speaker... [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:51 am
And, unlike a piece of carved wood that lays bare the work of a knife’s whittling, when the object of abuse is a human being, layers of shame, fear, and trauma often obscure the imprint of mental and physical abuse. ... [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:48 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to introduce evidence — Police report After discharging his counsel and representing himself at trial, Gregory Deron McKnight, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of sodomy, human trafficking, and causing a minor, E., to engage as a subject in pornography. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:30 am
The conviction stems from his conduct toward a Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) case manager. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:38 pm
Khalil v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:36 am
In the case of Yildrim v Turkey (Case No 3111/10) the Court of Human Rights decided that a Court order blocking access to “Google Sites” in Turkey was a violation of Article 10. [read post]
22 May 2019, 5:47 am
The complaint (full text) in State of California v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
In this sense, Holland has given the federal government greater freedom to enter into international agreements; without the decision, it would’ve been more difficult for the United States to join the human rights conventions and various other multilateral treaties that have emerged since World War II. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
The Attorney General, in a speech to Lincoln’s Inn, has stated his intent to limit the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights by intervening before the Grand Chamber in Scoppola v Italy (no. 3); another case concerning prisoners’ voting rights. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:40 am
Yesterday, the Colorado Supreme Court in Fuentes-Espinoza v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
