Search for: "Humane Society of the United States v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
The Resolution has been proposed at the United Nations annually since 1999, first at the Human Rights Commission under the rubric of racism, and, since 2005, at the General Assembly. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services has the potential to be one of the Supreme Court's landmark decisions. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:15 pm
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Grand Chamber this week affirmed what we’ve long known, that the United Kingdom’s mass surveillance regime, which involved the indiscriminate and suspicionless interception of people’s communications, violated basic human rights to privacy and free expression. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Equally, the European Court of Human Rights considers that the principles set out in the preamble to the Convention refers to the Convention as a whole (see, inter alia , ECHR rulings Engel and Others v. the Netherlands on June 8, 1976, Klass and Others v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Of particular relevance was the ECtHR decision in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR 29. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
Khan v. the United Kingdom). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:47 am
Recently, in Miller v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
Read Part I for a quick snap of what ins and outs of the zero draft, and Part II for a deep dive on Chapter IV, domestic surveillance powers.The United Nations Headquarters in New York City is poised to become the epicenter of one of the most concerning global debates affecting human rights in the digital age. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
Read Part I for a quick snapshot of the ins and outs of the zero draft; Part III for a deep dive on Chapter V regarding international cooperation: the historical context, the zero draft's approach, scope of cooperation, and protection of personal data, and Part IV, which deals with the criminalization of security research.The United Nations Headquarters in New York City is poised to become the epicenter of one of the most concerning global debates affecting human… [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
The law evolved dramatically in the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
Peter Prince, "‘Australia’s Most Inhumane Mass Deportation Abuse’: Robtelmes v Brenan and Expulsion of the ‘Alien’ Islanders"FORUMThe Myall Creek Massacre of 1838: Genocide, War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity? [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:00 am
Challenges to COVID-19 Orders by houses of worship are not limited to the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:01 am
Anne Marie Brennan, Historical Reflections on the Criminalisation of Terrorism under International Law from the League of Nations to R v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Consider Lucia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
But in this connection, let us turn to the case of Hirst v United Kingdom No2 (the prisoner voting case). [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
Our society uses these transformed stories in a way that conforms to what society wants to know. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights today gave judgment in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (Judgment of 10 May 2011). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:22 am
This would put us at odds with every other civilised state. [read post]
