Search for: "INFORRM" Results 381 - 400 of 950
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The irrefutable evidence that IPSO is and was always intended to be the same kind of sham regulators as its three un-illustrious predecessors emerges clearly from how it administers its primary remedy. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:47 am by INFORRM
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Incedal ([2016] EWCA Crim 11) is profoundly important for open justice and the public understanding of the security threats faced by our communities and for the accountability of those tasked with combatting security threats. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:50 am by INFORRM
The Inforrm Blog is six years old today. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Accordingly, in respect of cases that concerned a single thread on a Facebook page that contained multiple allegedly defamatory third-party postings, her Honour adopted the reasoning of HHJ Moloney QC – sitting as a High Court Judge – in McGrath v Dawkins [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) (see Inforrm article on that case here), where his Honour stated, in a case that concerned comments posted under Amazon reviews: [53] A special feature of chatroom or forum publications is the way in which… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 This decision followed the same Judge’s ruling in October 2015 that Google was liable for the defamatory content of hyperlinks and snippets referring to the plaintiff (see the Inforrm post on this decision). [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:28 am by INFORRM
In addition, the list of honorary silks includes the noted legal journalist, Joshua Rozenberg – the author of Privacy and the Press (OUP, 2004) Inforrm would like to congratulate the new appointees to silk. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
After a quiet few weeks, the Inforrm winter break ends today as the Hilary Legal Term for 2016 begins. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 In the second, Lachaux v Independent, the claimant succeeded in a case largely based on inference (see the Inforrm case comment). [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Over the last year we have covered a wide range of media and law stories on Inforrm, in the courts, in Parliament and in the press. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
It has also been another great year for views and posts on the Inforrm blog. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
XYT and BWE v Associated Newspapers [2015] EWHC 1162 (QB)) (see Inforrm case comment) AMC v News Group Newspapers([2015] EWHC 2361 (QB)) (see the Inforrm case comment) Dedicoat v News Group Newspapers, 27 October 2015. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Happy holidays to all Inforrm readers. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
And what a remarkable history it is – from our humble convict days, to the modern success of being crowned the libel capital of the world by academics (Roy Baker’sThird Person Singular, 17/10/2003) and bloggers (Inforrm, 12/10/2010); and, finally, to the enactment of a uniform code which Dr Rolph tells us is “characterised by haste and compromise”. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
 The version of this post available through Inforrm contains proposed language different from that which appeared in a footnote to the original Stanford CIS post. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
 He wrote an article for Inforrm criticising the changes here. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 4:11 am by INFORRM
This is one of a series of posts about the pending EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and its consequences for intermediaries and user speech online. [read post]