Search for: "Identive Group Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2020, 4:43 am
Strand, Shareholder in the Trademark and Litigation Groups at Wolf Greenfield]. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Washington district court has already granted Music Group expedited discovery to determine the identities of the Doe defendants. . . . [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 8:27 am by John Jascob
All of the members of the consortium are reputable business people, he wrote, and their identities have been fully disclosed to the SEC and CFIUS. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:48 pm by Vivian Brown
It is not yet clear whether those protections will be included in the final bill when it reaches the President's desk.EFF was joined on the brief by the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Online Policy Group, Salon Media Group, Inc., Six Apart, Ltd., the US Internet Industry Association, and ZipLip, Inc.Contacts:Kevin Bankston Attorney, Equal Justice Works / Bruce J. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:52 am
(with its ticker symbol “HPE”) and consisting of four divisions—Enterprise Group, Services, and Software and Financial Services. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 3:17 am
Strand, Shareholder in the Trademark and Litigation Groups at Wolf Greenfield]. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
San Pasqual Casino Development Group, Inc. , Cancellation No. 92056703 (June 22, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Heasley). [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 6:18 am by Kristian Soltes
Legal and Regulatory Developments SPOTLIGHT: Lawmakers Seek to Cancel Card Fee IncreasesPayments Dive – April 21, 2022 A bipartisan group of four lawmakers implored Visa and Mastercard on Friday to cancel credit and debit card “swipe” fee increases planned for this month, warning them about practices that could raise antitrust concerns. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:25 pm by Diana Lin
The repercussions of the Supreme Court’s 2011 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 4:45 am
Opposer Sexy Hair Concepts convinced the Board that it (Opposer, not the Board) owns a family of "SEXY" marks for various hair care products, leading to victory in its opposition to registration of the mark SO SEXY for essentially identical hair care products. [read post]