Search for: "In Matter of Brown*"
Results 381 - 400
of 10,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
On August 29, 2023, US federal banking regulators issued a proposal for long-term debt (“LTD”) requirements for certain midsize and larger US banking organizations (the “LTD Proposal”).1 The LTD Proposal is important because it would require many regional and larger banking organizations to issue significant amounts of LTD. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
DRIVING-WHILE-IMPAIRED CONVICTION AFFIRMED ON APPEALAfter he was convicted by the Criminal Court of the City of New York of driving while impaired by alcohol, RP appealed.And on its review of the matter, the Appellate Term, First Department, concluded that the outcome had been supported by “legally sufficient evidence. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
DRIVING-WHILE-IMPAIRED CONVICTION AFFIRMED ON APPEALAfter he was convicted by the Criminal Court of the City of New York of driving while impaired by alcohol, RP appealed.And on its review of the matter, the Appellate Term, First Department, concluded that the outcome had been supported by “legally sufficient evidence. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 2:20 am
Expert Panelists + John Rosenthal, Partner and Chair of eDiscovery & Information Governance Practice, Winston & Strawn LLP John Rosenthal is Partner and Chair of the eDiscovery & Information Governance Practice at Winston & Strawn LLP, where represents clients in an array of complex commercial litigation and MDL matters. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 11:44 pm
But it is still a political argument that could matter to some voters, just as Trump’s potential convictions at trial between now and the election could matter. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Elections National: “AI Deepfakes in Campaigns May Be Detectable, But Will It Matter? [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:16 pm
The Supreme Court in Brown Shoe clearly drew the “certainties/probabilities/possibilities” distinction: Congress used the words ‘may be substantially to lessen competition’ (emphasis supplied), to indicate that its concern was with probabilities, not certainties. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
" Act 689 is Not Narrowly Tailored The Court first considers the Supreme Court's narrow-tailoring analysis in Brown v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:16 pm
Not for parties considering mergers or, for that matter, for agency staff. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
” As a matter of human rights law, the United States assumed the obligation to implement such measures in 1994, when it ratified the ICERD. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 7:20 am
The other place where the law has not caught up to reality is the matter of estate law. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Decisions on these matters tend to be fact-based, and their impact is limited to situations that bear incredible factual similarities to the case being decided. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
Does it matter that no one on the Biden-Harris bus was going to vote? [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
In some jurisdictions, if the defendant can demonstrate that it is relevant to the case, the informant’s identity may be revealed (Brown, 1985; Feuer, 2001; Schreiber, 2001). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:04 am
But this position flatly contradicts unambiguous directives issued by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court regarding the handling of death penalty matters on collateral review. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Partner, Brown, Goldstein & Levy LLP Anisha Queen is a partner at Brown, Goldstein & Levy LLP, where she represents clients in a variety of civil matters. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
These, in turn, focus on how governmental decisions on technological standards should be understood in the context of the challenges and opportunities introduced by technological platforms to matters of national interest or concern. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Exemptions are construed "narrowly, and an agency has the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies 'by articulating a particularized and specific justification for denying access'" (Matter of Kosmider v Whitney, 34 NY3d 48, 54, quoting Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, 225). [read post]
