Search for: "In Re: v. In Re:" Results 381 - 400 of 62,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm by Tom Casagrande
Similar to the 10th Circuit case I posted recently, the 2d Circuit recently issued a decision concerning whether re-sale of materially altered goods under the original trademark can constitute trademark infringement.In Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
The final sentence of 35 USC 103(a), entirely unaffected by KSR v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:21 am
The latest issue of Humanitäres Völkerrecht (nos. 1–2, 2019) is out. [read post]
19 May 2009, 12:13 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg Eighth Circuit considers the admissibility of a statement under the "res gestae" doctrine, in United States v. [read post]
The post US appeals court agrees to re-hear Hawaii butterfly knife ban case appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
The case Re L (A Child: Media Reporting) [2011] EWHC B8 (Fam) has just been reported on Bailii. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:43 am by Amy Sayre, Paralegal
In the first Issue of Res Publica, The Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy blog and forum, Wexler Wallace Attorney Amber Nesbitt was interviewed about the Dukes v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice without reservation of right or limitation of the claims disposed of is entitled to preclusive effect under the doctrine of res judicata (see Matter of Hofmann, 287 AD2d 119, 123 ["An order of discontinuance effecting settlement on the merits is accorded the same res judicata effect as the entry of judgment on the merits"]; see also Fifty CPW Tenants Corp. v Epstein, 16 AD3d at 294). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
The Supreme Court of Canada’s unusual request to re-hear a case in order to allow newly appointed Justice Clément Gascon to participate has led many observers to assume an even split among judges, requiring a tiebreaker — but there are other possibilities to consider.The request was sent yesterday to counsel in Conception v. [read post]