Search for: "In Re: Amendments To The Florida Family Law Rules"
Results 381 - 400
of 461
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
In favor of the Condemned Ex parte Kenneth Eugene Billups (In re: Kenneth Eugene Billups v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
§ 2000cc et seq., to require only a minimal showing that a prison grooming rule which concededly imposes a substantial burden on religious exercise is the “least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
However, remember the new law sunsets in 2 years whereupon the exemption drops back down to $1 million unless there are new tax law changes. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
Brandishing a novel interpretation of the Second Amendment, the Court has either struck down or raised questions about virtually every state and local gun-control law in the nation. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:11 am
Florida wrestled with the idea of sentencing juveniles who commit crimes short of murder, to life without parole. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Rules of Juvenile Procedure -- Amendment -- Detention hearing -- Presence of counselIN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 8.010. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
(Docket Report) District Court S D Florida – Internet Radio Services do not infringe method claims requiring performance of steps by different parties not under common control: Zamora Radio, LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am
DoodyDocket: 09-1443Issue(s): Whether the Ninth Circuit disregarded the AEDPA and this Court’s recent decision in Florida v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 4:11 pm
However, there's been conflicting trial-court rulings on exactly what happens as a matter of law when a surviving spouses disclaims his or her homestead-property rights. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
The action complies with an amended determination set by U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 12:38 pm
They apologise to the victim's family and tell their family they love them.'See, it's important that when you're about to be killed, you obey the rules. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Ciavarella[17] pulls no punches: With utter disdain for the rule of law, defendants Mark A. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Archives can be found there and on our blog, The Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Blog. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
This article provides an overview of this new law.Act SummaryH.B 10-1394 (Construction Professional Commercial Liability Insurance Act or Act) amends CDARA and the Colorado Insurance Code by codifying certain interpretive rules for occurrence-based liability policies insuring construction professionals. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:15 pm
Levenson, a psychology professor at Lynn University in Florida who has studied sex offender treatment and housing restriction laws. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:50 am
Many Florida attorneys think that these latest rules proposed by the Florida Bar are a violation of their First Amendment right to free speech. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”Finally, Olson said, “I would not rule that out, Justice Stevens. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm
Also, the Court ruled that even if the prior action was no longer pending, and despite McWane referring to a prior pending action, this Delaware case should still be dismissed, the Court reasoned, because to allow the Delaware action to proceed after the dismissal with prejudice of the prior Florida action would ignore the binding effect of Florida adjudication and also create the possibility of inconsistent and conflicting rulings, which was… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm
At the center of the case was the question of whether the Florida Supreme Court "took" landowners' property by holding that the state's right to control sand deposited on submerged land by the government to re-build an eroded beach trumped the landowners' common-law right to littoral property landward of the mean high tide line. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
Costa Crociere, Justice Sotomayor wrote for the Court in holding that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow a plaintiff to amend the name of a defendant when she gets it wrong in her original complaint. [read post]
