Search for: "In Re: B.R.-2"
Results 381 - 400
of 570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Originally Published October 14, 2009 Introduction Nowadays, background checks of prospective employees are the rule, not the exception. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Baker, 413 B.R. at 42 n.4. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
In In re Dow Corning Corp., 250 B.R. 298, 362-63 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
(Resp. to Mot. for Relief from Stay 2.) [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 10:43 am
In re Mortgage & Realty Trust, 195 B.R. 740, 750 (Bankr. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:02 pm
In re Pass, 258 B.R. at 172. [read post]
8 May 2010, 2:44 pm
A contrary result was reached In re: Schorr, 299 B.R. 97 (W.D. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:07 am
" See In re Circuit City Stores, Inc., 416 B.R. 531, 537 (Bankr. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:07 am
See In re Circuit City Stores, Inc., 416 B.R. 531, 537 (Bankr. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:48 am
Bernard (In re Bernard), 99 B.R. 563, 570 (Bankr. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:48 am
Bernard (In re Bernard), 99 B.R. 563, 570 (Bankr. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:48 am
Bernard (In re Bernard), 99 B.R. 563, 570 (Bankr. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:43 pm
case=5242195965445786971&q=In+re:+Schorr&hl=en&as_sdt=80000000000003 , and In re: Scholl, 234 B.R. 636 (Bankr. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:20 pm
Somewhat surprisingly, rather than closely interpreting and carefully applying the applicable Florida statute, the appeals court chose instead to rely heavily on In re Sims, 241 B.R. 467 (Bankr.N.D.Okla. 1999), a case applying Oklahoma state law. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:20 pm
” Somewhat surprisingly, rather than closely interpreting and carefully applying the applicable Florida statute, the appeals court chose instead to rely heavily on In re Sims, 241 B.R. 467 (Bankr.N.D.Okla. 1999), a case applying Oklahoma state law. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
The recent decision In re Washington Mutual, Inc. [2] (which was followed even more recently in In re Accuride Corporation [3]) applies the disclosure requirements in Rule 2019 to members of an ad hoc group participating in a Chapter 11 case. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
” [2] The view portrayed in Professor Edelman’s statement is shared by many as the result of this case is likely to have its impact on other major sports leagues as well. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:54 am
This position, according to the Debtors, is supported by the decision in In re Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 421 B.R. 231 (Bankr. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
In re FF Acquisition Corp. d/b/a Flexible Flyer, 423 B.R. 502 (Bankr. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
Sloane, 193 N.J. 423, 434 (2008) (analyzing Fourth Amendment); In re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd., 322 B.R. 247, 257 (Bankr. [read post]