Search for: "In Re: Bader v."
Results 381 - 400
of 582
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm
Today, though, in Horne v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
So yesterday, at a re-argument of Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
The last case of the March argument session, Bullard v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am
You’re right about the “liberals” — Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion, and he was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonya Sotomayor. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm
Let’s talk about Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm
With the exception of Ruth Bader Ginsburg—who transferred to Columbia University School of Law—all nine obtained their law degrees from Harvard or Yale. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
” MLive covered the event and posted a short video of Justice Ginsburg discussing the Court’s 1996 decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
As I noted in my preview of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:18 am
One final point, about Terry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Holt v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at last week’s reargument order in the Armed Career Criminal Act case Johnson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:09 am
” He told Cortman bluntly: “You’re forcing us into making a very wooden distinction. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
” Finally, at Re’s Judicata, Richard Re suggests that Justice Elena Kagan’s concurring opinion, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, “might be an example of ‘aspirational narrowing,’” but he concludes that “[i]t’s less clear that [her] efforts will be successful. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm
In Lambert v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:57 am
Lawyers for both parties faced skeptical questioning in Tuesday’s arguments in Gelboim v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:43 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:06 pm
The Justices had tough questions for both sides Monday morning in Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
