Search for: "In Re: Extended Stay Inc"
Results 381 - 400
of 453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 7:15 pm
Updated for two additional notes to the SEC at bottom of post To the Securities and Exchange Commission: Recently, Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) CEO Patrick M. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
See In re Chambers, No. 01-01-01216-CV, 2002 WL 24567 (Tex. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:37 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 1:24 am
The three-judge panel made clear in its Aug. 4 ruling that it would not consider a stay. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:36 am
The trucks have several extended blind spots, and they may not see your vehicle. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:43 am
In re Refco, Inc. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
This 9th Circuit's reasoning in Douglas was extended in Harris v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Permanent injunction issued (and stayed pending appeal w/% sales put into escrow). [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
(Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Katrina Dewey, CEO & Publisher, Lawdragon, Inc.) [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High Court (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)… [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:24 pm
BackgroundRecall from the last post that when hiring designers for the project, the owner contracted with architects Woolen Molzan and Partners, Inc. [read post]
7 May 2009, 5:11 am
In re Bally Total Fitness of Greater New York, Inc., 402 B.R. 616, 2009 WL 931537, *1 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in independent… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Body Blue Inc.; Synergism Arithmetically Compounded Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
