Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases"
Results 381 - 400
of 402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 408(a)(8) The judgment of the District Court sentencing the defendant to 57 months is reversed, and the case is remanded for re-sentencing. 08a0025p.06 American Zurich v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Upton, No. 07-1456 Conviction and sentence on drug and weapons charges are affirmed over defendant's challenges to: 1) the voluntariness of his Miranda waiver; 2) the admission of a police officer's expert and lay testimony; 3) the district court's denial of certain jury instructions; and 4) his status as an Armed Career Criminal. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
" (In re Marriage of Fink (1979) 25 Cal.3d 877, 887.) [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
THE INCOMPETENT ADMINISTRATION OFLETHAL INJECTION PROCEDURES HASRESULTED IN FORESEEABLE ANDPREVENTABLE PROBLEMS IN NUMEROUSEXECUTIONS.......................................................29CONCLUSION..........................................................36TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Brown v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
They contend that the district court made the following errors: (1) holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to pursue their claims for prospective injunctive and declaratory relief; (2) finding that Meyer and Spingola are collaterally estopped from asserting their claims in connection with their 2001 arrests and prosecutions; and (3) disregarding the liberal pleading standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) when it concluded that Meyer and Spingola failed to allege a… [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Trop, the Court reaffirmed that the clause "must draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
In Trop, the Court reaffirmed that the clause "must draw its meaning from the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
The corresponding concept in civil litigation is res judicata: one can have only one trial for claims arising from one transaction or occurrence.In a criminal case, the suspect or defendant has the right to remain silent during questioning by police and prosecuting attorneys. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
In voir dire you're looking not just at how individual jurors will respond to your case, but also how they'll work together. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
In voir dire you're looking not just at how individual jurors will respond to your case, but also how they'll work together. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 7:51 am
The same definition for gross negligence was noted in In re Standard Jury Instructions-Civil Cases, (797 So.2d 1199 [2001] ), where the Florida Supreme Court authorized the publication of guidelines for jury instructions and model verdict forms with respect to the award of punitive damages in instances that involve intentional misconduct or grossly negligent conduct. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 7:51 am
The same definition for gross negligence was noted in In re Standard Jury Instructions-Civil Cases, (797 So.2d 1199 [2001] ), where the Florida Supreme Court authorized the publication of guidelines for jury instructions and model verdict forms with respect to the award of punitive damages in instances that involve intentional misconduct or grossly negligent conduct. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
"To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:52 am
No. 6 has no patience for holdouts: Had jury duty... got called on a case....GUILTY!! [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Twombly recognized that, in practice it was impossible to take Conley "literally," since the Conley "no set of facts" standard for dismissal "would dispense with any showing of a reasonably founded hope that a plaintiff would be able to make a case. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
State: I'll have to re-read Batson. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
SOURCE: Lawsuits.comA.A.R.P.: American Association of Retired Persons Abandon: To knowingly give up without intent to return or re-claim. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 10:49 pm
Oh, we're rolling? [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
That holding alone will likely invalidate dozens of state statutes and standard jury instructions. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
Doctors are going to come in this case and tell the jury what their opinion is of national standards, which should account for the very things that you're concerned about. [read post]
