Search for: "In Re Anonymous 2"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2009, 9:59 pm
Not thanking people in the blogosphere is (1) arrogant and (2) dumb. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:59 pm
Not thanking people in the blogosphere is (1) arrogant and (2) dumb. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:58 pm
Frequently, even anonymization methods are suspected of not effectively anonymizing personal data since the applied anonymization technique can be weak or the anonymized data can be so unique that it can still be linked with a specific individual. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
” We’re keeping an eye out on further SEC developments with insider trading policies – stay tuned! [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:27 am
I am informed the University is setting a tip line up for anyone wishing to submit information anonymously. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in BW Legal Services Ltd v Glassdoor Inc The dispute related to a Norwich Pharmacal order issued against the US company Glassdoor, that sought the identities of two anonymous reviewers who posted allegedly defamatory comments about the claimant on the defendant’s website. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
But at least we’re having fun, right? [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
bit.ly/KoaJsW (Allie Pippin) Another eDiscovery Milestone: State Judge Orders Predictive Coding - bit.ly/I3nav5 (Allison Frankel) Best Practices in Collecting Data: Who To Do It, When To Do It, How To Do It – bit.ly/Kobpyd (Mayer Brown) Computer-Assisted Review: Reducing Risk For The CPS - bit.ly/Ko6ZaD (Howard Sklar) Confusion Over The Scale & Nature Of Cyber Crime - bit.ly/KodYjQ (Keith Cottenden) Considered, Deferred, Denied… [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:15 am
Doe's fear of further emotional harm and re-traumatization presents a closer call. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:12 am
Bad, bad idea, especially for a law student. 2. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am
Someone asked (anonymously beforehand of course) whether the firm would be matching the spring bonuses of Cravath, Sullivan, Cleary and Simpson. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
T 27/94 [2]; T 378/88 [4]) there is no case of res judicata. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:55 am
The legislation does not regulate anonymous data, because there is no reasonable prospect of re-identification. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
July 2, 2013). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:05 am
That’s a 60.3% conviction rate which means roughly 2 out of every 5 people cited for DUI are not convicted of that offense. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:41 am
In a much anticipated decision in the class action In re Hulu Privacy Litigation, U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:45 am
Those Entourage episodes are $2 each for 30 minutes of SD quality video. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 12:31 pm
They’re there to apply the law to a set of facts established by the evidence and declare and enforce the parties’ respective legal rights. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:35 pm
(See below re poll inadequacies.) [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 3:21 pm
Ken, who has three rules for his blog ("(1) civility; (2) no politics; and (3) civility") deleted the comment before I could see it (a high-class gesture), but I got a taste of it from AHCL's blog, where AHCL chided our anonymous friend gently. [read post]
