Search for: "In Re Howell" Results 381 - 400 of 575
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm by cdw
” [via Tim Cone] Ex parte Carl Brad Ward; (In re: Carl Brad Ward v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:14 pm by Richard
May 4, 2011), and the rulings in In re Balas and Morales, No. 2:11-bk-17831 (Bky.C.D.Cal, June 13, 2011), and In re Ziviello-Howell, No. 11-22706 (Bky.E.D.Cal. [read post]
May 4, 2011), and the rulings in In re Balas and Morales, No. 2:11-bk-17831 (Bky.C.D.Cal, June 13, 2011), and In re Ziviello-Howell, No. 11-22706 (Bky.E.D.Cal. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
A similar result was reached in the Eastern District of California in In re Ziviello-Howell, Ch. 7 Case No. 11-22706, Civil Minutes, docket No. 44 (Bankr. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 7:08 pm by Brad Pauley
  The Supreme Court granted review and ordered briefing deferred pending its decision in Howell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Dave
The re-design of the administration of housing benefit has sought to address the scheme’s complexity in recent years – the local housing allowance is a particular example of this re-design, with the shift to flat rate payments according to household size. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:22 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Judge Beryl Howell gave Zaid until July 11 to respond in a written brief. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am by David Oscar Markus
.; Long, J Craig; Howell, Chanley T.; Harper, C. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:14 pm by Howell and Christmas, LLC
Apart from being outrageously dangerous, it is illegal to go around the railroad crossing arms when they're down. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:23 am by William Carleton
I'm scheduled to be a panelist on This Week in Law with Denise Howell this morning. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:14 am by Dave Wieneke
Matt Howell joins Arnold as Managing Partner, Global Chief Digital Officer. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:58 pm by Zoe Tillman
That suit involves the largest group of defendants, so the error could cost the plaintiffs the identities of more than 700 Time Warner subscribers; the movie company has 10 days to re-issue the subpoena. [read post]