Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 381 - 400
of 12,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
Frankly, I have yet to hear an argument in favor of the current system — it looks like The Legal Intelligencer was unable to find anyone willing to say there was some social value to this secret justice system. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The re-examination was also propelled by a 2015 EEOC ruling, in which it held, as a matter of agency interpretation, that discrimination against a man because he was gay constituted a form of actionable sex discrimination. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:44 am
So they’re not going to follow it. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
The justice who is editing a long opinion may miss something, because people get impatient. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:22 pm
If you’re looking for me, I’ll be “at the bar” and I won’t let the concurring opinion dampen my spirits. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
He also accused the Court of “failing to hold the Government to its burden to prove [every element of a criminal offense] beyond reasonable doubt” under In re Winship. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 1:18 am
The pundits are already giving opinions on how an Obama administration is going to change things. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:33 pm
We're unaware of any significant court-martial activity during this coming week.As always, if you know of other significant military justice developments or upcoming events, please drop us a note at caaflog@caaflog.com. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:42 pm
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 9:25 pm
This is, of course, the opinion of one observer, and other observers of the court and these justices might well disagree, but I felt some degree of comfort hearing this from somebody who is very analytical and pragmatic in evaluating what is going on. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:50 am
Two recent 4-3 opinions would suggest that the recent election of Diane Marie Hathaway to the Michigan Supreme Court is paying dividends to the cause of justice in Michigan. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:29 pm
Clearly, the Justice Department has nothing to hide. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 6:00 pm
If you own or run a business, they really do think you're crazy. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:22 am
Ideally, the legal system works to uphold justice and fairness, and defendants have the opportunity to fight back against this presumption of negligence. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:13 pm
The full opinion is available here. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:06 am
It is unthinkable that justices of a European court would appeal directly to public opinion, as Justices Harry A. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 4:00 pm
The Court’s juvenile-justice case In re H.V. was, as the opinion acknowledges, a first for the Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 8:50 am
I re-read (again) the Marsh USA case this morning, including the concurring and dissenting opinions. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
(I expect if there is a reversal, at least Justice Ginsburg would write something given her earlier unusual opinion with respect to the stay in the case.) [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am
Stevens’ writing has sometimes been quite controversial because he occasionally has appeared to be re-arguing cases in which he as a Justice was in dissent. [read post]