Search for: "In Re Phones for All, Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 1,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2017, 3:37 am
Applicant Soundscape, Inc. pulled out all the stops but its arguments for reversal of this Section 2(d) refusal failed to move the TTAB. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act is the result of a serious re-think of all the defects found in the Cyber-safety Act. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
In all other aspects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.BackgroundFrom 2007 through 2010, Hill was embroiled in a series of lawsuits involving his son, Albert G. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:55 am
In re LG Electronics, Inc., Serial No. 86472855 (September 13, 2015) [not precedential] (Opinion by Cindy B. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:52 am by MBettman
” Justice French On July 18, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in In re Adoption of P.L.H., Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-5824. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 12:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, “[t]wo of the leaflets requested recipients to call respondent at his home phone number and urge him to sign the ‘no solicitation’ agreement. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:42 am by Peter Breslauer
Quoting from its opinion in In re Horizon Healthcare Services Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:23 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
Many mobile apps require access and store data you’re not aware of, enabled by permissions sometimes given without a second thought. [read post]