Search for: "In re: Grand Jury Subpoena"
Results 381 - 400
of 603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), to the Scooter Libby/Judith Miller case, are quite hostile to the idea of a privilege in the face of a grand jury subpoena, and as I noted in my response to Chris Bray’s thoughtful post, the policy of the common law is hostile to such a privilege: For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public (in the words sanctioned by Lord Hardwicke) has a right to every man’s evidence. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
Treble damages shall be available in cases of willful or wanton disregard by the party obtaining the subpoena. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
Recently, I received a grand jury subpoena to produce documents — and learned that the Food and Drug Administration, the FBI, and the Department of Justice are each investigating whether our company violated criminal laws by shipping a medical device that the government believes had not been approved for use by the FDA. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
The Third Circuit reaffirmed the jurisdictional requirements for appealing an order to produce allegedly privileged documents in In Re: Grand Jury, ABC Corp.; John Doe 1; John Doe 2, No. 12-1697 (3d Cir. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:00 am
He was a grand jury witness who was told he was not a target. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:26 am
Grand jury subpoenas Andrea Sneiderman testimonyAtlanta Journal Constitution. all 11 news articles. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
The court held that the recipient of a subpoena may not be required to create a document, stating: The grand jury may designate papers it wishes produced. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:51 pm
The ABA’s paragraph (e) regarding limitations on subpoenaing lawyers to grand juries or other legal proceedings is viewed as unnecessary, as there are adequate safeguards in place for federal prosecutors, and the Utah criminal justice system does not typically use the grand jury procedure. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm
After his release, he was subpoenaed to testify before a Los Angeles grand jury continuing its probe into the scheme…. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:23 am
’” In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 241 N.J. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
All of the cases involving these dishonest Deputies should be re-evalutated. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, supra. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
CCRP 101 Abolition of coroner’s jury and inquest; investigation by coroner CCRP 102 Autopsy CCRP 103 Subpoena of witnesses; testimony; subpoena duces tecum; issuance CCRP 104 Employment of expert assistants CCRP 105 Coroner’s report; admissibility in evidence CCRP 106 Arrest of criminal suspect CCRP 131 Duties and powers CCRP 161 Property subject to seizure CCRP 162 Issuance of warrant; affidavit; description CCRP 162.1 Warrant issued upon… [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MARCH 25, 2011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:47 pm
In In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563 (1st Cir. 2001), the intervenors claimed that they themselves had an attorney-client privilege to assert. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Case no. 11-12268 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:27 pm
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 2012 U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
On the other hand, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit sitting in Atlanta held yesterday in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated March 25, 2011 that forcing a suspect to decrypt a computer or produce a decrypted version of the files on the computer is testimonial, and therefore does trigger Fifth Amendment protection. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]