Search for: "In re: Ware" Results 381 - 400 of 493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2010, 10:24 am by Andrew Dat
  And second, police are free to lie if asked if they’re a cop. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:04 am by admin
  That’s the beauty of the portable hole — once you’re through it, you’re really through it! [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:32 am
It certainly won't help future prosecutions that these claims have been thrown out by the federal judge and all that is left is a potential re-trial on theft of trade secrets grounds.According to Law.com, the judge reasoned "The government must present evidence that defendants intended to confer a benefit on the [People's Republic of China], not receive a benefit from it," Ware wrote. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Regal Ware, Inc et al (Docket Report) ITC decides not to review initial determination on invalidity in certain printing and imaging devices involving Ricoh and Oki Data (ITC Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination in certain voltage regulators (337-TA-564) involving Linear Technology and Advanced Analogic Technologies (ITC Law Blog) Defending yourself in inequitable conduct proceedings – CAFC en banc hearing pending: Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:55 pm by SOIssues
“When you say ‘high risk sex offender,’ you’re stating that as presumptive fact, and really you’re accepting—hook, line and sinker—the propaganda of a government bureaucracy” that is bloated and ineffectual, he said. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am by Jeffrey Vicq
However, it appears generally acknowledged that this trend halted in 2009 with a decision titled In re Bose Corp. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:05 am by Susan Brenner
The final charge – which we’re not going to deal with – was an unauthorized access to computers count under 18 U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:28 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But it doesn’t seem that factual statements should become less factual merely because they’re widely disseminated.) [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:20 am by SHG
Why do you think you’re entitled? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:03 pm by Walter Olson
[Free-Range Kids] Website’s terms and conditions include giving up your immortal soul [Popehat] Scottish jury says charges “not proven” against lawyers in case of monetary demand for return of stolen Leonardo da Vinci painting [Guardian, earlier] If you’re going to shake down food makers with false claims of contaminants in their wares, it’s best to vary your story patterns [Tacoma News-Tribune, Seattle Times] “My task is simple: spew… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:11 am by John J. Cord
The description of the episode seems to be an indictment of sorts against the way things are done in the Pharm industry--drug companies selling their wares by plying doctors with gifts--little things, like office supplies, stress balls, gadgets, and trips to Hawaii. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm by Laura Bergus
If you’re one the (un?) [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
We’re bothered by the fact that there is any demand — outside of perhaps morbid curiosity — for her wares at all. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 2:45 pm by Ben Sheffner
Akanoc, Judge James Ware explicitly held that the Gore analysis of the ratio between actual damages and punitive damages is inapplicable in the context of copyright (and trademark) statutory damages. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by SHG
  When you show up unwanted and unneeded, you really don't get to demand much of anything.Bloggers don't really expect you to pay them to promote your wares. [read post]
  If you need more evidence to become convinced, just ask Facebook about the $873,277,200 judgment they won against a Canadian spammer who used the social networking service to illegally advertise his wares. [read post]