Search for: "In re SULLIVAN" Results 381 - 400 of 2,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 2:32 pm by Greg Lambert
If anything, these voices will remind us that we’re not alone, that we can drive change, and that our efforts to provide knowledge and information however and wherever it is needed, is more important than ever. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Back to Work: Protect Directors Too Posted by William Regner and Jeffrey Rosen, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Friday, June 19, 2020 Tags: Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, COVID-19, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fiduciary duties, In re Caremark, Risk oversight, Securities litigation Making Corporate Purpose Tangible—A Survey of Investors Posted by Edouard Dubois and Ali Saribas,… [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 4:09 am by SHG
“The fact that we’re getting good things from the Trump administration is confusing, but isn’t it better than an unbroken avalanche of bad things? [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:47 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Gore and In re Flynn involve extreme time pressures. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The fact that the judges of the Southern District re-appointed Mr. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
If you are divorce or about to be divorce you understand how important but also how difficult it is to control your ex-spouse from disparaging you to third parties. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 5:59 am
https://t.co/uBW3FUFI33— Andrew Sullivan (@sullydish) June 20, 2020I had to ask who was Albert Pike. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 6:53 am
Woke dreck like this. https://t.co/2OgGY5sIQV— Andrew Sullivan (@sullydish) June 13, 2020 [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Sullivan’s hearing is scheduled for July 16. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:53 am by David Bernstein
His own New York Magazine has banned columnist Andrew Sullivan from writing about the recent protests. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333 (CanLII) [42] The trial judge was correct in finding s. 33.1 to be in prima facie violation of both ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Charter. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 3:30 am by SHG
They’re supposed to be journalists during happy times or sad times. [read post]