Search for: "In re. M. B." Results 381 - 400 of 9,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 1:40 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Ebenso müssen die WHH den Betreiber so schnell wie möglich über ihre Feststellungen informieren und ihm ausreichend Zeit zur Behebung der Sicherheitslücken geben. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Bill Marler
Here is the recommendation of the Foundation: Option B: Separate Medical Products and Foods within FDA Key Changes from Current Structure:  Creates both a Deputy Commissioner of Foods and a Deputy Commissioner for Medical Products and Tobacco, each with line authority over respective Centers  Establishes a Chief Foods Officer within the Office of the Commissioner  Considerations: This structure elevates the visibility of the FDA Human Foods Program within FDA… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court thinks this result is dictated by a single panel of the Ninth Circuit; I’m not so sure. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[2] The time is indeed ripe for us to re-examine how we assess bank mergers under the statutory framework that Congress has enacted. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 10:56 am by Roger Parloff
Even Fox News chief political analyst Brit Hume, while voicing concerns about Trump’s conduct, did a version of the “many-Republicans-believe” dodge recently: At the same time, of course, . . . we’re going to hear an awful lot about the unequal application of justice from [Trump’s] defenders and perhaps from his defense team in light of the way in particularly the Hillary Clinton case was handled, where she was, where James Comey, then FBI director, had… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:59 am by SOQUIJ
La constance avec laquelle les tribunaux québécois ont invalidé les peines minimales en cause était pertinente. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:08 am by Eric Goldman
The California legislature is competing with states like Florida and Texas to see who can pass laws will be more devastating to the Internet. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Auch scheitert CastMagic zum Teil an Abkürzungen wie EDÖB und VUD. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Section 939A(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 required the SEC to remove references to rating organizations from their rules and forms. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
 In 1966, President Lyndon B. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am by Eric Goldman
In this post, I’m only going to focus on the findings that I think may be replicated in other cases going forward. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 4:44 am
” It's odd that Cruz assumes people know this song, which I see was the B side of "Love Is a Battlefield. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Müller, Marriage Litigation in the Western Church, 1215–1517 Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2021. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
E199 (2010). [2] Notice of retraction for Teng Zeng & William Mitch, “Oral intake of ranitidine increases urinary excretion of N-nitrosodimethylamine,” 37 Carcinogenesis 625 (2016), published online (May 4, 2021) (retraction requested by authors with an acknowledgement that they had used incorrect analytical methods for their study). [3] Tianwei He, “Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010,” 96 Scientometrics 555 (2013); Bhumika Bhatt, “A… [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
La preuve établit que l’interruption de la démarche thérapeutique qu’il a entreprise à la suite de sa remise en liberté le mènerait à perdre tous ses acquis et même à régresser. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
  However, E2EE also affects criminal law enforcement: Scanning digital communications and files to detect CSAM (or terrorist content, or politically verboten material, or evidence of crimes that used to be basic rights) doesn’t work when they’re end-to-end encrypted. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm by Administrator
Conseil québécois sur le tabac et la santé, 2019 QCCA 358 (CanLII) [658] En conclusion de ce chapitre et à l’instar du juge de première instance, la Cour conclut que, pendant toute la période litigieuse, les appelantes ont failli au devoir de renseigner les usagers et futurs usagers des dangers et risques de la cigarette. [read post]