Search for: "Instructional Systems v. Computer" Results 381 - 400 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2014, 7:47 pm by Dennis Crouch
  In essence, software instructions literally, but temporarily, reconfigure electronic pathways and transform computing hardware to perform real, useful, and physical activity. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:27 am
[O]n June 4, 2009, Zaratzian called Cablevision and, upon learning Abadir's email account was still being maintained, instructed Cablevision to close Abadir's account. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 2:58 pm by Craig Ball
It’s closer to a quarter of a million students and 21,000 faculty in the whole UT system who face this unprecedented test of their resiliency. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
This is a system designed to encourage mistakes.[12] Instead, we should demand the utmost candor in warrant applications. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:45 am by Susan Brenner
A computer service includes `any and all services provided by or through the facilities of any computer communication system allowing the input, output, examination, or transfer, of computer data or computer programs from one computer to another. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
First, there was implementing code; this contained the actual instructions for tasks to be performed by the computer. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:23 am by Dennis Crouch
File Attachment: NY IP Law Ass'n--ISO Neither Party.pdf (735 KB) Efforts in some decisions to dissect the claim into old and new parts or computer and non-computer elements, should be rejected as squarely inconsistent with the Supreme Court's holdings in Diamond v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:59 am by Dennis Crouch
A copy of the decision is not yet available online, but study of the online file of the European patent application (which was not opposed after grant) is instructive. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Ninth Circuit’s unpublished April 17, 2018 opinion in Aqua Star (USA) Corp. v. [read post]