Search for: "Insurance Company v. Davis"
Results 381 - 400
of 405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2008, 4:40 pm
The Court of Appeal rejected this argument on the basis that an insurance company should not suffer a financial loss because an insured settled her claim on a compromised basis.Here is the case citation: Saskatchewan Health-Health Care Assn. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:33 am
Water company's rights - Michigan attorney Alan T. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 4:23 pm
March 22, 2007.Here is a link to the decision.This case was originally summarized by Shanti Davies and originally edited by David Pilley.The Third and Fourth Excess Insurers provided coverage to the Insured Company under policies that are part of what is known as a "ladder" scheme. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:09 pm
Leonard, Inc. v Quantum Sail Design Group, LLC et al Government Employees Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 2:55 pm
November 21, 2007.Here is a link to the decision.This case was originally summarized by Shanti Davies and edited by David Pilley.The Insured software company applied for Information Technology Errors and Omissions insurance from the Defendant Insurers for the period of February 28, 2002 to February 28, 2003. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 6:15 pm
In contrast, the later starters or smaller companies are subordinated to the big companies or governments passively. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 9:05 am
[2] Mallard v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 9:27 pm
The landscaping company (the "Insured") had obtained a general liability insurance policy from the Insurer, which included coverage for bodily injury and death, among other things, caused by the Insured’s activities and operations. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:35 pm
" In 2001 the Supreme Court of Delaware, in the case of Davis v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 9:29 pm
Buell v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:53 pm
"You're not entitled to uninsured motorist benefits if the guy that hit you is covered by a $1,000,000 insurance policy and you get $1,000,000 from his insurance company. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
§ § 844(i) and 1341, respectively, for setting his church on fire and attempting to collect money from the church's insurance company after the fire. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Thus, at best, Karl has just created a regime of redundant and overlapping liability with the patients stuck in the middle - not knowing whom to believe if doctors and drug companies say different things.The learned intermediary rule thus makes sound practical sense. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Parke-Davis, 147 F. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:15 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:44 pm
PARTNERSHIP v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 10:21 am
Transcontinental Insurance Company - Hoffman, Sr. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 10:09 am
Non-compete; trade secrets Cincinnati Insurance Company and Indiana Insurance Company v. [read post]
