Search for: "Interest of Bc"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2007, 1:31 pm
As long as the present bowl system is filling the stadiums and drawing sufficient sponsoring money, there is certainly no compelling reason to change a system which is working well just because it may not always perfectly determine "a national champion".Indeed, the constant controversy which the BCS engenders on the topic is probably good for fan football interest over the long haul.But let no one say that a legitimate single elimination Division I-A football playoff… [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
It is well known that in the legal profession interests change and there is great mobility. [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:36 pm
It should make for a very interesting eight months of negotiations among conference suits and men with brightly colored blazers. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 8:50 am
Even if you were interested in the topic, the support was nice! [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:18 pm
The BC Supreme Court has come up with two typical routes of disclosure; the “Jones” order and the “Halliday” order. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
It will be interesting to see if the words in Phoenix portend the Law Society of BC’s genuine intention to prohibit all non-BC or Canadian storage providers, or whether the discretion of the new rules will be used with more nuance… and hopefully some consultation with the hundreds if not thousands of lawyers in small firms and solo practice who have grown reliant on the various cloud products which have become mainstream. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:23 pm
” Paragraphs 159-190 contain the Court’s reasoning behind this conclusion and are worth reviewing for anyone interested in seeing how BC Courts can deal with a claim that pre-existing psychological injuries are aggravated by a collision. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
On appeal in McNeice the BC Court of Appeal found, that the deletion of the files was more consistent with an intention to conceal, and thus to maintain a privacy interest, than it is with the idea of “abandonment”, and an intention to give up a privacy interest. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:51 pm
It is in the interests of the court and of the parties to resolve disputes as soon as they arise to promote efficient use of court time. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 12:30 pm
Travlos and the College have a legitimate interest in ensuring that persons attending IMEs understand the nature and purpose of the IME. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 9:19 am
The Province had a right to participate with the plaintiff and had a participatory interest in the outcome. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 7:16 am
Reasons for judgment were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Prince George Registry, demonstrating this. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:50 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court dealing with this interesting issue. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:49 am
There is nothing wrong with telling someone you are not interested and do not wish to hear about their product. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:57 pm
His video, including some interesting interviews with RCMP and B.C. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:27 am
Reasons for judgement were released this week with the BC Supreme Court citing Wikipedia when assessing damages following a motor vehicle collision. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 7:16 am
Reasons for judgement were released by the BC Court of Appeal last week addressing such a situation. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
I have two new practical tools to share with you: An Unbundling Toolkit for Lawyers and Paralegals (version 1.0); and The BC Family Unbundling Roster The Toolkit version 1.0 During the surveys and interviews with family lawyers and paralegals conducted as part of Mediate BC’s Family Unbundled Legal Services Project, we heard time and time again that lawyers are interested in providing unbundled legal services to families but need a more structured approach to… [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
But special interest groups are far from alone in recognizing BC’s deficiencies. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
But it is interesting to see it used as part of the ‘nuts and bolts’ of an Article 8/proportionality judgement.Mr Miller (M) held a non-secure tenancy of a flat with Fareham BC. [read post]
