Search for: "Ip v. C. I. R" Results 381 - 400 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
In its controversial ruling in Case C-530/12, OHIM v National Lottery Commission [extensively reported by the IPKat here],the focus was on the probative value of national law: does it need to be considered by OHIM and by the General Court as a matter of fact or as a matter of law? [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On Tuesday 9 February 2016, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), handed down judgment in Guardian News And Media Ltd & Ors v R. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
How can you even engage the conversation when it’s a trump card to say “that can’t be the rule b/c I found one case that says something else. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am by Barry Sookman
The University of Toronto professor asserts this Article “[i]t adds several badly written, ambiguous trade-secret propositions to the law” which would so chill entrepreneurship that by itself it “would cost the U.S. and Canadian economies significantly higher orders of magnitude in terms of lost growth, jobs and welfare than any positive benefits that the TPP might bring. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
Nearly one month ago, I set out to outline the case against the Bell coalition’s website blocking plan. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Ringer, 579 F.2d 294, 297 (4th Cir. 1978).See, for example, Adobe Systems v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 9:06 pm
After quoting patent attorney John R. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:45 pm by Barry Sookman
The court rejected this contention, relying, in part on the recent Google right to be forgotten case (Google v AEPD CJEU Case C‑131/12 13 May 2014) where Google made and lost the same argument. [read post]