Search for: "Irish v. Irish"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2017, 2:15 pm
” In 1999, another federal court, in a case involving the Idaho Potato Commission, noted that “the potato, commonly referred to as common potato, white potato or Irish potato, is botanically unrelated to the sweet potato or the yam, with which it is often confused. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
The right to freedom of expression is protected both by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and by Article 40.6.1. of the Irish Constitution. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
On Mill’s response to the Irish Famine, see Henry Farrell’s recent post at Crooked Timber, “Millian Liberalism and the Irish Famine. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:06 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:17 am
Clearly in this instance, it had no appetite for a Roe v Wade moment. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:41 am
. * Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive mandates a substantive change, says Irish Court of AppealThe InfoSoc Directive was found to introduce changes allowing graduated response systems as a form of injunction - independently of a finding of their liability, said Hogan J in Sony Music Entertainment Ireland Ltd & Ors v UPC Communications Ireland Ltd. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Lord Rodger gave a dissenting opinion in Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] UKSC 10; but also on applications for judicial review in certain Northern Irish cases. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:18 pm
Minister Sherlock is engaging extensively on this matter on his twitter page, and argues that the SI simply clarifies the law in light of the decision in EMI v UPC, the difficulty seems to be in terms of clarity and scope. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:57 pm
Given the jurisprudence of the Irish Supreme Court in cases such as Clinton v An Bord Pleanála and others it is likely that the attitude of the Irish courts would be similar to that of their American counterparts in Kelo. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
The recent judgments in Kay v United Kingdom (ECHR, 21 September 2010) and Manchester City Council v Pinnock (UK Supreme Court, 3 November 2010), and the implications which they have for Irish housing authorities under the ECHR Act 2003 will be discussed in detail. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am
In Carson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am
Maybe Epic v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
In Dogru v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am
The Irish High Court finally submitted its questions—eleven, to be exact—in April. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v… [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:37 pm
Invoking Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:35 am
Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:41 am
Value Pricing v. [read post]
