Search for: "Ives, A. v. Ives, K."
Results 381 - 400
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:39 am
IV. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:55 am
During the Company's two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and through March 23, 2009, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted Grant Thornton LLP regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Grant Thornton LLP concluded… [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Part IV concludes with an overview of the cost-benefit considerations that both industry and consumers must face in deciding how food irradiation fits into the big picture of prevention and control of foodborne illness. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:37 pm
In Kahn v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Part IV concludes with an overview of the cost-benefit considerations that both industry and consumers must face in deciding how food irradiation fits into the big picture of prevention and control of foodborne illness. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 10:45 pm
V. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
IV. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm
Title IV, Small Company Formation. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
The Prosecutor v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 2:27 pm
” Shimanovsky v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:16 am
v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business and Associate Dean for Information Systems and Technology, New York University School of Law Panel V. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
K. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:39 am
No. [2] Larry Aspin & William K. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
.'"] The key passage, from Judge Andrew Carter's opinion Tuesday in Jones v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
Title I also tasks the SEC with a review of Regulation S-K. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 7:22 am
The Commission Implementing Regulation No 1329/2014 (point 9 of Annex IV to Form V) does not have a bearing on this decision as it can only implement but not modify the Regulation (para. 73). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
In Gonzaga University v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:14 am
” Accordingly, the SEC offered up “several non-exhaustive examples of possible voting arrangements,” including arrangements to: (i) vote along with corporate management’s direction; (ii) vote along with the direction of a particular shareholder bloc; (iii) not vote where the costs are excessive or large relative to client benefits; (iv) only vote on certain transactional matters (such as M&A activity); or (v) not vote where the vote would… [read post]
