Search for: "J. G.1" Results 381 - 400 of 4,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2018, 8:25 am by Sander van Rijnswou
There should be no remaining real possibility of a party or the public suspecting bias after a decision by a board (cf. decisions G 1/05, OJ EPO 2007, 362, points 2 and 7; J 15/04 of 30 May 2006, points 12 and 13; T 584/09 of 1 March 2013, point 7; and R 2/15 of 21 October 2015, points 3 and 4).4. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
 This article included a mis-statement of the dosage of levonorgestrel used in the one dose regimen in the project as 1.5 g rather than 1.5 mg. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:30 am by Jon Gelman
Am J Public Health 2008;98:1372–81.Burton M, Cobb E, Donachie P, Judah G, Curtis V, Schmidt WP. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
So long as there is one visa kept available, it would provide the legal basis for an I-485 filing under a DFF, and this would be consistent with INA 245(a)(3) as well as 8 CFR 245.1(g)(1). [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Two comments relevant to subsection (g) were also added to the Rule: [3] Discrimination and harassment by lawyers in violation of paragraph (g) undermine confidence in the legal profession and the legal system. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The consensus falls apart over the merits of Selikoff’s actual research, his credentials, and his advocacy tactics.[1] Selikoff’s collaborators, protégés, and fellow travelers tend to brand any challenge or criticism as “scurrilous. [read post]
  *2021 CALT intern [1] 20 CFR § 655.122 (q) [2] 20 CFR § 655.122 (L) [3] 20 CFR § 655.122 (k) [4] 20 CFR § 655.122 (j) [5] 20 CFR § 655.122 (p) [6] 20 CFR § 655.122 (h)(2) [7] 20 CFR § 655.122(h)(3) [8] 20 CFR § 655.122 (h)(4) [9] 20 CFR § 655.122 (d)(1) [10] 20 CFR § 655.122 (d)(1)(ii) [11] 20 CFR § 655.122 (d)(1) [12] 20 CFR § 655.122 (g) [13] 20 CFR… [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 1 May 2020, Warby J handed down judgment in the Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2020] EWHC 1058 (Ch). [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm by NL
Or, as per Robert Walker J in Stockholm Finance Ltd v. [read post]