Search for: "J. Grant" Results 381 - 400 of 17,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 11:02 am by Kirsten Klahn
Department of Justice has awarded a grant to the Wisconsin Innocence Project at the University of Wisconsin Law School's Frank J. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
May 11, 2018 Mannion, J.), the court granted the carrier’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment with respect to the Plaintiff’s bad faith count in a UIM case. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Jan. 28, 2021 Harlacher Sibum, J.), the court granted a Defendant dentist’s Motion for Summary Judgment in a dental malpractice case. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:30 am
Oregon Law Libraries RFP Rev4_1 For more information, contact: Laura J. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The appellant argued that this portion expressed the legitimate expectation to the effect that any first extension of a time limit set for filing observations to a communication pursuant to A 94(3) would be granted. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Admissibility of the appeal[1] The appealed decision did not terminate the procedure up to grant concerning the present patent application. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
  This morning, Birss J handed down his decision in Chugai Pharmaceutical v UCB & Celltech [2018] EWHC 2264 in favor of Chugai.The issueThe AmeriKat heads into her BankHoliday weekend armed with Birss J'slatest judgmentThe case concerns a worldwide licence granted to Chugai by UCB, for US patent 7,566,771 entitled "Humanised Antibodies". [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
March 19, 2020 Robreno, J.), the court granted a carrier’s summary judgment in an UIM bad faith claim that involved allegations of a delayed investigation and a delayed settlement payment.According to the Opinion, it was the Plaintiff’s argument that the carrier acted unreasonably in taking fifteen (15) months to make a settlement offer.The court noted that, although bad faith can be proven through unreasonable delays in paying a claim, “‘a long period of… [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:08 pm
By not doing so, it has violated its duty of clarification (Aufklärungspflicht). [10]The Board then discusses decisions J 15/92 (where re-establishment was granted on the basis of the principle of good faith), J 34/92, J 6/90, and J 6/98 (where re-establishment was refused on the basis of legal security). [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am by Nico Cordes
In practice, divisional applications have virtually always been filed in the language of the proceedings for the parent application, even though EPC 1973 allowed them to be filed in the original language of the parent application, for instance Spanish or Dutch.However, the option of using any language for filing European patent applications could have increased demand for divisional applications in the original language of the parent application, given that Article 14(2), second sentence, EPC allows… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:02 pm by CSSFIRM.COM
The post J&J Wins “Defense Pick” TVT Mesh Case appeared first on . [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Under the principles laid down in the decisions T 14/89 and J 13/90, there is a legitimate expectation on the part of the applicant that the EPO should draw to the applicant’s attention deficiencies in a request for re-establishment of rights which are obviously easy to correct. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:28 am by Ray Dowd
., 07 Civ. 2103 (June 23, 2010 SDNY), Judge Stanton granted summary judgment dismissing contributory copyright infringement claims against YouTube and upheld the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, 17 USC 512(c) for internet service providers (ISPs). [read post]