Search for: "J. S. Morales" Results 381 - 400 of 3,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 6:30 pm
 Cuba's National Assembly on Friday approved a sweeping update of its family law which opens the door to allowing gay marriage, greater women's rights, and increased protections for children, the elderly and other family members. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
"  But what about originalism's great historic rival, "living constitutionalism? [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In a rather unusual case, Dingemans J has had to consider whether the moral attitudes – as revealed by his blog posts – of a father who was estranged from the mother of his son supported the Family Court’s decision not to allow him parental access. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is central to Vermeule’s argument that we are not, morally speaking, free to choose what vision of the common good should animate the constitutional regime. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:25 am by Rose Hughes
 Final thoughts"Salvation"While philosophical discussions of AI inventorship may soon become pertinent as the field develops, the Board of Appeal in J 8/20 found no legal, moral or practical difficulties with dealing with such inventions under the current system. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Constitutional text often provides examples of such legitimate aim; for example, Art 40.6.1(i) permits the state to legislate for reasons of “public order or morality”. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:05 am by JB
  Second, arguments for following tradition assume that the tradition is wise or morally worthy from today’s perspective. [read post]
And the core of the movement to abolish abortion is a moral and ideological cluster of ideas, which are in esse [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm by Josh Blackman
To be clear, even if four character witnesses attest that the applicant has "good moral character," the government can use a person's social media account to "confirm" the person in fact does have "good moral character. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Han-ah Sumner, Alana Nance, Teresa Chen
By refraining from acceding to the convention—they claim—the United States allows itself to remain open to criticism from China and loses moral ground to dispute their actions in the South China Sea. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
For those who take this view, judgments against TNCs resulting from litigation taking point of departure in the treaty, even if unenforced, for instance, might nonetheless have a valuable function as moral judgements, offering political capital in other settings.I would not see this outcome as success, however, and I don’t share its assumptions. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But the Supreme Court wrote, in an opinion by Justice William J. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 11:34 am by Josh Blackman
But after this discussion, Kavanaugh pivots: The issue before this Court, however, is not the policy or morality of abortion. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:29 am by Josh Blackman
Filko (CA3 2013) (Hardiman, J., dissenting). [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
" As I mentioned in my post about the California AG's letter, it's not clear to me that such a character-reference requirement is a permissible condition for exercising what the Court has said is a constitutional right. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
" It is reasonable to consider such factors in evaluating an applicant's proof of the requisite moral character to safely carry firearms in public. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Is there a stronger obligation to steer the client towards the most morally sound result in the circumstances, even if that result is not consistent with the client’s initial instructions or equivalent to what they are legally entitled to? [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
Because of their religious commitments (for which the not-at-all-devout Donald J. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:41 am by Eugene Volokh
And this tendency may turn from merely a legal rule that judges presumptively follow into an attitude-altering influence—judges may well conclude that they should assume that the precedents are morally or empirically sound, at least unless there's some strong reason to doubt their soundness. [read post]