Search for: "JF"
Results 381 - 400
of 443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am
R (on the application of E) (Respondent) v (1) JFS Governing Body (2) Admissions Panel of JFS (Appellants) : R (on the application of E) (Respondent) v (1) JFS Governing Body (2) Admissions Panel of JFS (Appellants) & ORS (United Synagogue) - [2009] UKSC 15 – Read judgment / Press summary A school for Orthodox Jews which tested applicants for matrilineal descent was acting on the basis of ethnic origin, meaning that their admission requirement… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:00 pm
Click to read full article [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:00 pm
Click to read full article [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:40 am
JFS stuck to the Orthodox position on this issue, and aggrieved parents who felt they were also Jewish went to the civil courts. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:38 am
R (E) v Governing Body of JFS and another (United Synagogue and others intervening) [2009] UKSC 15; [2009] WLR (D) 366 "A Jewish school which, in the event of the school being oversubscribed, gave priority to children who were recognised as Jews according to the tenets of Orthodox Judaism, ie the children of mothers who were [...] [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:23 am
Regina (E) v Governing Body of JFS and Another, United Synagogue and Others intervening Supreme Court "The admissions policy of a Jewish school which gave priority, in the event of oversubscription, to children who were recognised as Jews under the standard Orthodox test of matrilineal descent, someone whose mother was a Jew either by birth or conversion, [...] [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:35 pm
Nine justices ruled, by a small majority, that the JFS in London had breached race relations legislation. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:30 pm
The case grew out of competition for admission to JFS, a premier Jewish school. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:17 am
" The London secondary school, JFS [school website], denied admission to the boy, known as M, because his mother is Jewish by conversion, not by birth. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 12:45 am
C07- 4195 JF, 2009 WL 2512197 (N.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 6:52 pm
C 08-00882 JF and C 08-00877 JF (N.D.Cal. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:54 am
“A leading Jewish state school goes to the new Supreme Court today to challenge a ruling that it broke race laws. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:22 am
Tejada Garcia explicou que não é possÃÂvel utilizar o e-Proc dos Juizados Especiais Federais para os processos comuns que tramitam na JF. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:52 am
Supreme Court E, R (on the application of) v Governing Body of JFS & Anor (Rev 3) [2009] UKSC 1 (14 October 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2009] EWHC 2549 (Admin) (16 October 2009) High Court (Family Division) ITW v Z & Ors [2009] [...] [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:28 am
R (E) v Governing Body of JFS and others (No 2) [2009] UKSC 1; [2009] WLR (D) 298 “As a general principle, if the Legal Services Commission funded a litigant who was successful in his cause, that decision should ordinarily amount to close to an assurance that the Commission would continue to support him in any [...] [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:24 am
Regina (E) v Governing Body of JFS and Others (No 2) Supreme Court “When the Legal Services Commission decided to fund a litigant who was successful in his cause, that decision should ordinarily be seen to carry with it something close to an assurance that the commission would continue to support him in any subsequent appeal by [...] [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
This was opposed by JFS. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:33 am
It decided that the Legal Services Commission should provide funding for the pending appeal in the JFS case (concerning the admissions policies of a Jewish school). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:47 am
C 08-2832 JF (RS), 2009 WL 2706393 (N.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:00 am
JFS requires three points to be considered a priority applicant. [read post]
