Search for: "January v. Sullivan*"
Results 381 - 400
of 411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2007, 11:29 am
The New York Law Journal reports this morning (March 15) that NY State Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried has ordered that some lawyers who were present at the "secret" settlement meeting on January 31 submit to depositions to settle a hotly disputed point: whether a Sullivan & Cromwell partner who was present at the meeting, Gandolfo V. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
(The Court has also turned down later appeals seeking to raise the Second Amendment issue, most recently in January of last year in Seegars v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:01 pm
Charney v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:58 am
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Charney v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 3:40 am
Adams filed his petition for grant of review on January 10, 2007. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Each month this fiscal year, we have been looking at the Courts of Criminal Appeals' output to see if we can recognize a statistically significant diminution in output in the wake of United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
Sullivan & Cromwell and Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:09 am
We got enough material from this morning's hearing in Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
It would explain a lot: (1) the mysterious period in between the initial incident of alleged harassment, in May 2006, and Aaron's filing a pro se Complaint in New York Supreme Court, in January 2007;(2) Aaron's general skittishness about discussing his prior representation (and the circumstances of its termination); and(3) S&C's initial statement that it rejected his demand for a "multi-million dollar" settlement (i.e., they were willing to fork over a few… [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 4:28 am
LEXIS 29 (January 26, 2007). [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 8:52 am
Scheich made to an ABC News reporter about the Charney v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 1:41 pm
CAAF didn't announce that reargument until 10 January, so it appears that Moran was probably assigned to a judge at the conference for the 14 November arguments. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:31 am
In order to comply with supbcription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view the full text of cases listed below:
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
1.
People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 1:59 pm
On 19 January, CAAF granted review in the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 8:48 am
If we could post normally, we'd have already written about LeGal bitchslapping John Scheich, the juicy Wall Street Journal article on Sullivan & Cromwell's troubles (aside from Charney v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 12:40 am
In order to comply with supbcription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view the full text of cases listed below:
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
1.
People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:08 pm
It has tried to distract everyone from the train wreck called Charney v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:58 am
In order to comply with supbcription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view the full text of cases listed below:
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
1.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:24 am
* Last Tuesday, a civil action captioned Aaron Brett Charney v. [read post]
