Search for: "John Barnett"
Results 381 - 400
of 796
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
Roberts Jr., John Roberts, Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Nicholas Rosenkranz, Obamacare, Orin Kerr, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Piers Morgan, Politics, Randy Barnett, Rick Hasen, SCOTUS, Supreme Court [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:27 am
And at The New Republic, Leon Wieseltier provides a “citizen-reader’s” interpretation of the health care decision that focuses on two sentences in the opinions, while at The Washington Post (here and here), columnist Jennifer Rubin interviews Randy Barnett and John Yoo about the case. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
The list of witnesses is available here and includes Baroness Onora O’Neill, Philip Coppel QC, Claire Enders, Max Mosley, Dr Damian Tambini and Professor Steven Barnett. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 7:40 am
Many people are trying to find the motivation of CJ John Roberts in his extraordinary opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
At SCOTUSreport, John O. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
John Yoo has come to the same conclusion. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
John Yoo has come to the same conclusion. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:23 am
(Randy Barnett) I am prepared to believe Jonathan’s report that John Roberts has done this before. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 8:40 am
(Randy Barnett) While I am reprinting old posts, I thought I would repost this from May, a month before the decision (bold added): Another Switch in Time? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm
In a Volokh Conspiracy post, Professor Randy Barnett of Georgetown also said Siegel and Cooter seem to have "anticipated" the Chief Justice's approach in their paper. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
”Professor John Yoo has told the New York Times that, if the story is true, Roberts has misunderstood his job. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
Chief Justice John Roberts justified his re-characterization of the “penalty” in Obamacare as a “tax” on the ground that the amount involved is so small as not to be coercive. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
On the conservative/libertarian side of things, there is significant disagreement about whether Chief Justice John Roberts' opinion was a "good" or "bad" thing from a legal, policy and political perspective, but there appears to be pretty widespread agreement that the Chief switched his position very late in the game - going from the four conservative justices who wanted to kill the whole damn thing on the grounds that it was an unconstitutional… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
This “completely undermines its legitimacy as a precedent,” as my co-blogger Randy Barnett told John Fund. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
(Randy Barnett) Today marks the 160th anniversary of one of Frederick Douglass’s most moving speeches, “What July 4th Means to the Negro. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
(Randy Barnett) [From the next edition of my casebook, Constitutional Law: Cases in Context:] When reading the Declaration, it is worth keeping in mind two very important facts. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:16 pm
I don't have much of substance that I care to add to Leakapalooza, although I was amused by Randy Barnett's quote in the John Fund story. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:53 am
It might even bring a crisis of leadership for Chief Justice John G. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
In the alternative view that also has been taken by Einer Elhauge, John Yoo and others, Congress lost nothing in the decision. [read post]
