Search for: "John Doe Q"
Results 381 - 400
of 739
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Other people, in their eyes, are “lesser,” and it does not matter if the “people who really matter” do whatever they see fit, no matter if that means ignoring the rules everyone else must live by. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:36 am
“[T]he gap between an ‘Internet addict’ and John Q. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
Be sure to check the Q&A on the ProjNet website for any official responses from the Army on these topics. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Employee Ownership of Social Media Assets - http://bit.ly/PyFq4W (Thomas Mahlum, Andrew Pieper) Cybersecurity Becoming No. 1 Concern for GCs and Directors - http://bit.ly/PoKu9T (Catherine Dunn) Deleting Emails Actually Costs Resources - http://bit.ly/N2shTn (Kayla Krause) Does the End Justify the Means? [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:55 pm
This posting was written by John W. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:55 pm
This posting was written by John W. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm
What does this tell us about the scope of the case? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
Second, show that it’s bad even though what the troll does in in strict compliance with the letter of the law. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:28 am
Their main concern is that Q&A 30 does not provide interpretative guidance regarding the disclosure obligations but rather sets forth new rules that were not previously contained in any previous DOL guidance. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Q: is a Mechanical Turk participant someone who gets intrinsic rewards at all? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall, who authored the opinion in Gibbons, observed that there were limits on Congress’ power to regulate under the Commerce Clause: “It is not intended to say that these words comprehend that commerce, which is completely internal, which is carried on between man and man in a State, or between different parts of the same State, and which does not extend to or affect other States. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall, who authored the opinion in Gibbons, observed that there were limits on Congress’ power to regulate under the Commerce Clause: “It is not intended to say that these words comprehend that commerce, which is completely internal, which is carried on between man and man in a State, or between different parts of the same State, and which does not extend to or affect other States. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:30 pm
There's a clear, well-lit video on which you can be seen and heard stating "As God is my witness, my name is John Q. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:31 pm
The AP ran a Q&A on this issue that does not clarify much. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:43 am
Steve Hehn at NPR has this All Things Considered piece on the CIA’s venture capital fund, In-Q-Tel. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
At least one news outlet suggests it does. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
Sebelius, a SCOTUS majority in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, calling balls and strikes, upheld most of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
Sebelius, a SCOTUS majority in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, calling balls and strikes, upheld most of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
Sebelius, a SCOTUS majority in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, calling balls and strikes, upheld most of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
It will take time – but progress does seem to be rather slow. [read post]
