Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 381 - 400 of 9,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Francis Scholar, Rutgers Law SchoolCriminal Law (1:30 – 2:45 pm)Tracey Maclin, Raymond & Miriam Ehrlich Chair in U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
The uneasy and delicate question looms large whether and how Article 19(1) TEU and the task of ensuring the observance of the law affects the scope and nature of the jurisdiction of the Court which is defined by the principle of competence d’attribution. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(b)(1) ["[c]onstitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of 'course of conduct'"]; see Thomas v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
The 12th Amendment does not require a winning candidate to receive a majority of the Electoral votes that are in theory available (538). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:08 pm by Josh Blackman
"Will Baude clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts and is among the most distinguished scholars there is. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 12:04 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Bush Administration and for John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court emphasized that the fact that the organization's intent was "to exercise a coercive impact on [the broker] does not remove" the First Amendment's protections. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 2:20 am by Rob Robinson
The company has achieved ISO 27001 compliance and completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit for all five trust principles for the second year in a row. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
” X does not define what it considers biometric, though other companies have used the term to describe data gleaned from a person’s face, eyes and fingerprints. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
In that context, a gag order "will withstand constitutional scrutiny only where there are specific findings supported by evidence that (1) an imminent and irreparable harm to the judicial process will deprive litigants of a just resolution of their dispute, and (2) the [gag order] represents the least restrictive means to prevent that harm. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:11 am by Eugene Volokh
" To determine whether speech is commercial, courts are to analyze three factors: "(1) is the speech an advertisement; (2) does the speech refer to a specific product or service; and (3) does the speaker have an economic motivation for the speech. [read post]