Search for: "John Does 1 - 3" Results 381 - 400 of 9,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
” Its initial discovery efforts gave it reason to believe that one of the John Doe defendants had a bank account with TD Bank. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Until a few days ago, if one who was board certified used that title in any letterhead or ad, the following disclaimer was necessary:  ""[1] The [name of the private certifying organization] is not affiliated with any governmental authority [,] [2] Certification is not a requirement for the practice of law in the State of New York and [3] does not necessarily indicate greater competence than other attorneys experience in this field of law. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:32 am by INFORRM
Is John Whittingdale the most hostile politician ever to have responsibility for the BBC? [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Corporation of Charleston, 1 S.C.L. (1 Bay) 441 (S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 3:23 am
In New York, that share is equal to 1/3 of the deceased spouse's estate. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:37 am by Jeralyn
Her doctor didn't confirm she was pregnant until July 3, 2007. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Does: In this action against unnamed and unknown defendants, John Does 1–11 …, Richard Roe … moves to proceed under a pseudonym or, in the alternative, to seal the case. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
The settlement of the UBS "John Doe" Summons case in Miami and U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:05 pm by Tom Smith
If he does have a dog, it isn't a labrador. 3) Biking is inherently dangerous. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Plaintiff Malibu Media, LLC, filed a copyright infringement action against Defendant John Doe. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:05 pm
" Examining Attorney Judy Helfman had refused registration under Sections 1, 3 and 45 of the Trademark Act on the ground that the specimen does not show use of the mark for the identified services as required by Trademark Rule 2.56. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
Thomas Todd, WLF] No, Kaiser Health News and Scientific American, a 1-in-3 rate of post-marketing drug safety alerts does not prove FDA too lax [“Scott Alexander,” Slate Star Codex] Jim Hood Watch: “Mississippi AG, with the help of outside attorneys, sues pharma companies over allegedly unapproved drugs” [Jessica Karmasek, Legal Newsline] When deconstruction met evidence-based medicine and denunciations of “microfascism” ensued… [read post]