Search for: "K. Wilson" Results 381 - 400 of 837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Bill Otis
I occasionally read liberal criminal law blogs to see which aspect of Amerika, a/k/a The Great Satan, deconstructionist legal thinking is criticizing at the moment. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:10 am
"Milk glass" by Stefan Kühn Aha, consumer confusion! [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:07 am by Jim Sedor
Lobbying  “K Street Eyes Late-Year Rebound” by Megan Wilson for The Hill Campaign Finance “Divided D.C. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
& K. 98 at 103, 39 E.R. 618 at 620-21:The foundation of this rule is not difficult to discover. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Government Says it’s Impossible) http://t.co/QoIy9UxR41 -> Encryption might be the reason we've never heard from aliens, says Snowden http://t.co/LUavp2uHBT -> Distribution right encompasses advertisement for sale of copyright works, says the CJEU http://t.co/Dkzp4nMhT9 -> Case Law: Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown, corporate damages and injunction against unknown operators of website https://t.co/X2xwIANpUo -> Australian Department of Immigration data breach… [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:29 am by Jim Sedor
Lobbying “K Street Merger Yields New Lobbying Powerhouse” by Megan Wilson for The Hill Oregon: “Portland Weighing Rules on Lobbying by Political Consultants” by Brad Schmidt for Portland Oregonian Campaign Finance New Jersey: “Greater Transparency Urged for Political Donations by Private Pension Managers” by John Reitmeyer for NJ Spotlight Ohio: “Ohio Judge Loses Fundraising Challenge” by Lorraine Bailey for Courthouse News Service… [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Government Says it’s Impossible) http://t.co/QoIy9UxR41 -> Encryption might be the reason we've never heard from aliens, says Snowden http://t.co/LUavp2uHBT -> Distribution right encompasses advertisement for sale of copyright works, says the CJEU http://t.co/Dkzp4nMhT9 -> Case Law: Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown, corporate damages and injunction against unknown operators of website https://t.co/X2xwIANpUo -> Australian Department of Immigration data breach… [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
§10.85(k), “[a] statement or advice given by an FDA employee . [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:01 pm by Law Lady
REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY a foreign corporation, LIGGETT GROUP, LLC, a foreign corporation, f/k/a LIGGETT GROUP, INC., f/k/a LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY and VECTOR GROUP LTD, INC., f/k/a BROOKE GROUP, LTD, a foreign corporation, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. 4th DistrictThe Law Lady. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:21 am by Joe May
K Street Betting on HillaryThe Hill – Megan Wilson | Published: 8/20/2015 While many lobbyists are holding their pocketbooks in the early stages of the 2016 election cycle, Hillary Clinton received at least $625,703 from 316 registered lobbyists and corporate PACs during the first half of the year. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lobbying “K Street Bouncing Back in 2015” by Megan Wilson for The Hill Washington: “PDC’s Lobbyist Filings to Get Upgrade” by the Editorial Board for The Olympian Campaign Finance “The Only Realistic Way to Fix Campaign Finance” by Lawrence Lessig for New York Times “Dems Urge Obama to Veto Bill over Campaign Finance Restrictions” by Cristina Marcos for The Hill Kansas: “Brownback Campaign Sought Cash from Westar Official… [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson find that Article 8.1 ECHR is engaged (although the interference can be justified on the ground of Article 8.2, on the basis that the act of publication of the image was a necessary interference by a public authority in accordance with the law), while Lord Clarke, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge disagree and opine that Article 8.1 is not engaged on the facts of this case. [read post]