Search for: "KENNEDY v. MARSHALL" Results 381 - 400 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 7:46 am by Steve Hall
Panetti tried to call Jesus Christ and John Kennedy as witnesses. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:11 am by Josh Blackman
(For seven months, he tried to move the deciding justices on Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
It is not hyperbole to recall the trenchant words of Chief Justice John Marshall: “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
  Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
(Remember that last year, Mary Kennedy and several members of the Kennedy clan showed up on the last day, with young grandchildren in dress clothes, which was a giveaway of the news that would break that afternoon of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement.) [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:49 am by Carlton Larson
  Instead, the most likely successors to Vinson would have been John Marshall Harlan under President Eisenhower or Byron White under President Kennedy. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
 It's true that Justice Kennedy's opinion in Lawrence does not use the magic words "fundamental right" (except in discussing Bowers v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Lawfare Staff
Andrew Erickson and Connor Kennedy provide additional details about China’s “Little Blue Men” in the second installment of their series on this important subject. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
(A draft article cowritten by Harvard Law School's Randall Kennedy lays out a wealth of evidence on this.[1]) Less than two weeks ago, the word was mentioned 52 times in the opinions in a Connecticut Supreme Court decision (State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
 (So did Justices Marshall and Blackmun.) [read post]