Search for: "KING v STATE FUND"
Results 381 - 400
of 857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm
The resulting federal court victory in Thompson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
He argued that compelling him to disclose his text messages would violate the state and federal constitutions and was prohibited by state and federal statutes. . . . [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
NYT Yahoo v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The case of King v Victor Parsons & Co [1973] 1 WLR 29 examined the situation where a person acted recklessly “like the man who turns a blind eye” determining that a person who “refrained from further inquiry lest awareness of a risk should prove to be correct, was said to be in the same position as a person who acted knowingly”. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
Of the thirteen judges at the hearing in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:58 pm
Just last term, in Vermont v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:21 am
Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a majority in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 5:30 am
Importantly, they also do not receive funding from the royal finances. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:58 pm
King [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, LLP, 188 AD3d 530, 531 [1st Dept 2020], quoting McCoy, 99 NY2d at 301, citing King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
Courts presume all language in a statute has meaning, and yet the interpretations offered by the IRS’s defenders — including Judge Edwards and those on the Fourth Circuit panel in King v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
In Apple v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:49 am
In Holder v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
