Search for: "Kelley v. Kelley"
Results 381 - 400
of 738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2016, 3:05 am
” – featuring Brink Dickerson of Troutman Sanders; Chris Holmes of E&Y; Deb Kelley of Genesis; and Dave Lynn of TheCorporateCounsel.net and Morrison & Foerster… When Stars Collide: CEOs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:56 am
Kelley Drye. and a Roundtable discussion entitled "What Keeps You Up at Night? [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:20 am
The court ruled 7-2 in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 9:02 am
It is unclear whether the rule in BDO Seidman LLP v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:16 am
RareNames, WebReg, D2009-1673 (WIPO February 11, 2010) or it was a generic or descriptive term lacking market penetration to have come to the respondent’s attention as in Patricia Kelley v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:46 pm
" Waxman, who recently won a ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 5:29 am
Binky Cat v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:26 am
Kelley v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Press, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:32 pm
Kelley, 2007 Mo. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm
In Murray Braun v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:08 am
Kelley v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am
However, unlike Sterritt, Kelley (@danielmakelley on Twitter) is now apparently a reformed character, seeking to pursue a legitimate cyber security career (Computer Weekly, 18 June 2022). 5. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Sampson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2014]; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012 [1968]). [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Kelley, Robin D.G. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
"* This dicta**generates some speculation that had Morehouse not retired from his position with BOCES, the Commissioner may well have concluded that his rights to reinstatement from the school district’s preferred list for technology teacher may have survived for the seven-year period mandated by law notwithstanding his employment by BOCES.* In order to establish entitlement to appointment to a new position under §§2510 and 3013, the petitioner must first establish that the… [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Kelley, 969 S.W.2d 402, 405-06 (Tenn. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:37 am
(See Hallock v State of New York, supra; Kelley v Chavez, 33 AD3d 590 [2006]; Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. [read post]
