Search for: "Kennedy v. Director" Results 381 - 400 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 9:05 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
The rational basis test used by Judge Walker is in line with the standard used by Justice Kennedy in cases like Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:34 am by Adam Schlossman
: The Supreme Court’s Impact on Black History for the Past Fifty Years” –Michael Klarman, professor at Harvard Law School “Ending Racial Preferences” –Roger Clegg, president of the Center for Equal Opportunity “Justice Kennedy’s Evolving Views On Race” –Heather Gerken, professor at Yale Law School Podcast: Interview on Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by WIMS
As our case amply demonstrates, campaign finance legislation over the last two decades has imposed, as Justice Kennedy put it, a 'censorship . . . vast in its reach.' By overruling Austin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a post by Article 19 Director Thomas Hughes, “Who will protect press freedom now? [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Even the so-called independent directors are often only independent in the sense of not being employees of the company. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:06 am by Jordan Steiker
Parker Chair in Law and Co-Director, Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas School of Law. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The Supreme Court did kill Quill, with Justice Kennedy writing for the majority, “Because the physical presence rule of Quill is unsound and incorrect, Quill Corp. v. [read post]