Search for: "Kennedy v. The State Bar"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Steager 17-419 Issue: Whether the Supreme Court’s precedent and the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity bar states from exempting groups of state retirees from state income tax while discriminating against similarly situated federal retirees based on the source of their retirement income. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm
Kennedy has the opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
Justice Kennedy with opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
The Court’s Rejection of the Physical Presence Rule in Quill Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court; writing for a majority that included Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, and Gorsuch.[8] Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
Wayfair, the Court concluded 5-4 that the Dormant Commerce Clause does not bar states from taxing out-of-state retailers that sell products to those within the state. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Steager, 17-419, involving whether the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity bars states from exempting groups of state retirees from state income tax while not exempting similarly situated federal retirees. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:14 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:38 am
” Kennedy identified several factors that make the probable cause bar inapt for Lozman’s case. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm
Kennedy is next with Lozman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:21 am
In Lozman v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm
His opinion in Henson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Kennedy)Alien Tort Statute (28 U. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:58 pm
Justice Alito with opinion in Husted v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Justice Samuel Alito is up next with Husted v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:08 pm
After the Washington Supreme Court upheld a ruling that she had violated the state’s law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation, Stutzman asked the justices to review the state court’s decision. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am
” Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion made it abundantly clear that Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am
Windsor and Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
Unless pervasive discrimination or monopoly bars individuals from alternative providers, the state can’t justify prohibiting discrimination. [read post]
